oa So, can teaching grammar work?

References

1. Farrokhi F, Talabari AA. Focus on form instruction in EFL: Implications for theory and practice. J English Lang Teach Learn. 2011; 222:53:29–47.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Hinkel E, Fotos S. From theory to practice: A teacher's view. New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2002;:1–12.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chastain K. Developing second language skills: Theory and practice. 3rd ed. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1988.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Richards JC, Rodgers TS. Approaches and methods in language teaching. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chomsky N. Topics in the theory of generative grammar. Walter de Gruyter. The Hague: Mouton 1966.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Krashen SD. Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1981.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Krashen SD. The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman 1985a.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Krashen SD. The comprehension hypothesis and its rivals. Eleventh International Symposium on English Teaching/ Fourth Pan Asian Conference. Taipei: Crane Publishing Company 2002;:395–404.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Mason B, Krashen S. Can extensive reading help unmotivated students of EFL improve? ITL Rev Appl Linguist. 1997; 117-118::79–84.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Elley W. Raising literacy levels in third world countries: A method that works. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Krashen SD. The power of reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Lee S, Hsu Y. Determining the crucial characteristics of extensive reading programs: The impact of extensive reading of EFL writing. IJFLT. 2009; 5:1:12–20.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Lewis M. The lexical approach: The state of ELT and the way forward. Hove, England: Language Teaching Publications 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lewis M. Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into practice. Hove, England: Language Teaching Publications 1997a.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lewis M. Pedagogical implications of the lexical approach. Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997b;:255–270.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Savignon SJ. Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL Quart. 1991; 25::261–277.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Schmidt RW. The role of consciousness in second learning. Applied Linguistics. 1990; 11:2:129–158.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Khodayari HR, Attaollahi M. Essential topics for MA entrance exam in TEFL. Tehran: Pardazesh 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Krashen SD. Inquiries and insights. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press 1985b.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Genesse F. Learning through two languages: Studies in immersion and bilingual education. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Harley B. Directions in immersion research. JMMD. 1991; 12:1-2:9–19.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lyster R. The effects of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students' sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics. 1994; 15::263–287.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Spada N, Lightbown PM. Intensive ESL programmes in Quebec primary schools. TESL Canada J. 1989; 7:1:11–32.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lightbown PM. Can they do it themselves? A comprehension-based ESL course for young children. Comprehension-based language teaching: Current trends. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press 1992;:353–370.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ellis R. Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pica T. Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure. Language Learning. 1983; 33::465–497.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ellis R. Instructed second language acquisition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Doughty C, Williams J. Pedagogical choices in focus on form. Focus on form in classroom. 1998; L2::197–261.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ellis R. Introduction: Investigating Form-Focused Instruction. Language Learning. 2001; 51::1–46.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Spada N. Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching. 1997; 30::73–87.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Long M. The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. Handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Academic Press 1996;:414–468.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Doughty C. Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. Cognition and second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001;:206–257.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ellis R. Teaching and Research: Options in Grammar Teaching. TESOL Quart. 1998; 32:1:39–60.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lyster R, Ranta L. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1997; 19::37–66.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Goldenberg C. Teaching English language learners: What the research does-and does not-say. American Educator. 2008; 32:2:8–44.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lightbown P, Spada N, White L. The role of instruction in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1993; 15:2:143–145.
    [Google Scholar]