1887
8 - The 3rd Mustansiriyah International Dental Conference
  • ISSN: 1999-7086
  • EISSN: 1999-7094

Abstract

Aesthetic zone refers to maxillary anterior region, from canine to canine, which is important in smile aesthetics. However, based on smile width, this area may be extended to include premolars. The aim of this study was to navigate the aesthetic zone of the upper premolar region for dental implant treatment.

This study was conducted at a private dental center in Baghdad. Dental implant cases treated between January 2018 and April 2023 were included in the study. One hundred and ninety-six patients were included in the study.

The demographic data, surgical information, dental implant zones, anterior aesthetic, premolars, and molar non-aesthetic zones, were recorded. Patients with incomplete data were excluded from the study. Descriptive and inferential statistics were implemented. The chi-square test was used to determine the relationship between nominal study variables.

The male-to-female ratio was 1:2. The highest percentage of implant replacement was found in the upper premolar region (28.7%), followed by the lower molar (23.6%), and the upper anterior aesthetic zone: the upper incisors (16.1%), and the upper canines (3.4%). Early success rate was approximately equal in the anterior, premolar, and other zones, but with the highest value in the premolar area (94%).

There is a high demand for upper premolar implants by both genders compared to the aesthetic zone. This highlights the peculiarity of this zone and underpins the suggestion for classifying the upper premolar zone as aesthetic zone II.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2024.midc.15
2024-12-02
2024-12-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jemtac/2024/8/jemtac.2024.midc.15.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2024.midc.15&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alhamdani F, Abdulla EH. Influence of Patient’s Age and Gender on Dental Implant Treatment Five Year Retrospective Study. J Med Res Health Sci. 2021; 4:(9):1461–7. https://doi.org/10.52845/JMRHS/2021-4-9-5
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Jung RE, Ioannidis A, Hämmerle CH, Thoma DS. Alveolar Ridge Preservation in the Esthetic Zone. Periodontology 2000. 2018; 77:(1):165–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12209
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cho HL, Lee JK, Um HS, Chang BS. Esthetic Evaluation of Maxillary Single-Tooth Implants in the Esthetic Zone. J Periodont Imp Sci. 2010; 40:(4):188. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.4.188
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Al Mukhtar YH. Analysis of Reasons for Permanent Teeth Extraction in Adult and Children in Iraq, Mosul, Retrospective Study. Int J Dent Sci. 2021; 3:(1):96–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Almasri M. Assessment of Extracting Molars and Premolars After Root Canal Treatment: A Retrospective Study. Saudi Dent J. 2019; 31:(4):487–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.04.011
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Afify A, Haney S. Management of Challenging Esthetic Anterior Cases with Limited Restorative Space: A Clinical Report. J Prosthod. 2018; 27:(7):593–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12750
    [Google Scholar]
  7. McNamara L, McNamara Jr JA, Ackerman MB, Baccetti T. Hard-and Soft-Tissue Contributions to the Esthetics of the Posed Smile in Growing Patients Seeking Orthodontic Treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:(4):491–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.042
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sabri R. The Eight Components of a Balanced Smile. J Clin Orthod. 2005; 39:(3):155–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Al Obaidy RA. The Visible Portion of Upper Anterior Teeth at Rest. Mustansiria Dent J. 2008; 5:(4):398–402.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee AM, Poon CY. The Clinical Effectiveness of Alveolar Ridge Preservation in the Maxillary Anterior Esthetic Zone—A Retrospective Study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017; 29:(2):137–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12280
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Slagter KW, den Hartog L, Bakker NA, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Immediate Placement of Dental Implants in the Esthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis. J Periodontol. 2014; 85:(7):e241–50. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.130632
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bedrossian E. Implant Treatment Planning for the Edentulous Patient: A Graftless Approach to Immediate Loading. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010Apr15.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tunkiwala A, Kher U, Vaidya NH. “ABCD” Implant Classification: A Comprehensive Philosophy for Treatment Planning in Completely Edentulous Arches. J Oral Implantol. 2020Apr1; 46:(2):93–9. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00147
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Karthik K, Thangaswamy V. Evaluation of Implant Success: A Review of Past and Present Concepts. J Pharm Bio Sci. 2013; 5:(Suppl. 1):S117–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.113310
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome Evaluation of Early Placed Maxillary Anterior Single-Tooth Implants Using Objective Esthetic Criteria: A Cross-Sectional, Retrospective Study in 45 Patients with a 2-to 4-Year Follow-Up Using Pink and White Esthetic Scores. J Periodontol. 2009; 80:(1):140–51. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080435
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Khan M, Kazmi SM, Khan FR, Samejo I. Analysis of Different Characteristics of Smile. BDJ Open. 2020May5; 6:(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-020-0032-x
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Coppola G, Christopoulou I, Gkantidis N, Verna C, Pandis N, Kanavakis G. The Effect of Orthodontic Treatment on Smile Attractiveness: A Systematic Review. Prog Orthodont. 2023; 24:(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-023-00456-5
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson DK, Smith RJ. Smile Estheties After Orthodontic Treatment With and Without Extraction of Four First Premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 108:(2):162–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70079-x
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Block M. The Science of Osseointegrated Implant Reconstruction. In Peterson’s Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. ChamSpringer International Publishing. 2022;311–370.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Tolstunov L. Implant Zones of the Jaws: Implant Location and Related Success Rate. J Oral Implantol. 2007; 33:(4):211–20. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[211:IZOTJI]2.0.CO;2
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Juodzbalys G, Kubilius M. Clinical and Radiological Classification of the Jawbone Anatomy in Endosseous Dental Implant Treatment. J Oral Maxillofacial Res. 2013;4(2):e2. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2013.4202
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Aljafar A, Alibrahim H, Alahmed A, AbuAli A, Nazir M, Alakel A, et al. Reasons for Permanent Teeth Extractions and Related Factors among Adult Patients in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Sci World J. 2021; 2021:5534455. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5534455
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Imura N, Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Souza-Filho FJ. The Outcome of Endodontic Treatment: A Retrospective Study of 2000 Cases Performed by a Specialist. J Endod. 2007; 33:(11):1278–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.07.018
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Karthikeyan I, Desai SR, Singh R. Short Implants: A Systematic Review. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012; 16:(3):302–12. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.100901
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2024.midc.15
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2024.midc.15
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error