1887
  1. Home
  2. Conference Proceedings
  3. QScience Proceedings
  4. Engineering Leaders Conference 2014 on Engineering Education
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Historically, the construction industry has been plagued by substantiated unethical business practices that lead to loss in construction quality, economic damage, loss of reputation, and increased risks in public health and safety. These unethical acts draw negative attention to the industry. In order to curtail unethical business practice in the construction industry, it is critical to make ethical education a cornerstone of the construction engineering curriculum. Students within the discipline must have comprehensive ethics education to ensure that they are capable of making informed, responsible decisions on projects when on the job. Ethics education is important to rectify the issues of unethical practices; it is also a key component to academic program accreditation. Accreditation requires departments and programs to have qualified instructors to develop and teach ethics and integrate it into the core curriculum.

The authors posit that departments and programs in construction engineering have an ethicist among their faculty. This scholarly paper outlines the role and characteristics of an effective ethicist using existing literature from within and outside the discipline. The authors suggest that qualified instructors should be ethicists who can fulfill these roles: (1) having a foundation in construction ethics philosophy, (2) teacher/consultant, (3) consultant/teacher, (4) versatility as an educator, and (5) stranger characteristics. Ethicists should master these roles to be effective conveyors to disseminate the information to students. As an ethicist, one must possess the ability to not only be a versatile educator, but one must also have ‘stranger” characteristics. The authors of this paper seek to facilitate a broader discussion about the need and importance of employing an ethicist in the discipline and also inspiring new and innovative research around the subject matter.

© 2015 Johnson, Sands, Fiori, Pearce, licensee Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation Journals.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.67
2015-08-29
2024-11-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qproc/2015/4/qproc.2015.elc2014.67.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.67&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adnan H, Hashim N, Mohd N, Ahmad N. Ethical issues in the construction industry: Contractor's perspective. Jour. of Soc. & Behavioral Science. 35:719–727.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Adnan H, Hashim N, Mohd N, Ahmad N. Ethical issues in the construction industry: Contractor's perspective. Jour. of Soc. & Behavioral Science. 35::719–727.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Lambsdorff JG. Global corruption report 2005. Berlin, Germany: Transparency International and University of Passau Sept. 2005.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Abdul-Rahman H, Wang C, Yap W. How professional ethics impact construction quality: Perception and evidence in a fast developing economy. Science Research & Essays. 5:23:3742–3749.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). Accreditation Policy and Procedure Manual (APPM), 2012–2013. Baltimore, MD, 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Archer M, Verster J. Ethics, leadership and education. In Proc. RICS Construction and Property Conf., COBRA. Salford, U.K 2011;:808–816.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Fellows R. Professionalism in construction: Culture and ethics. Proc., CIB TG23 International Conference, CIB. Hong Kong, China 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Ahn YH, Hyuksoo K, Pearce AR, Shin H. Key competencies for US construction graduates: an exploratory factor analysis. In ASC Proc. of the 46th Annual International Conference. Boston, MA, 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Ahn YH, Hyuksoo K, Pearce A. R., Shin H. Key competencies for US construction graduates: an exploratory factor analysis. In ASC Proc. of the 46th Annual International Conference. Boston, MA 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. American Council for Construction Education (ACCE). Document 101 Accreditation Manual. Oct. 2012;. Retrieved http://acce-hq.org/accreditationprocedures.htm .
  11. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). Accreditation Policy and Procedure Manual (APPM), 2012–2013. Baltimore, MD, 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). Accreditation Policy and Procedure Manual (APPM), 2012-2013. Baltimore, MD, 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Sinha SK, Thomas HR, Kulka JR. Integrating ethics into the engineered construction curriculum. Journ. of Professional Issues in Eng. Educ. and Practice. 133:4:291–299.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Kang BG., Price A, Thorpe T, Edun-Fotwe F. Ethics training on multi-cultural construction projects. Construction Information Quarterly. 8:2:85–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Scalza A. Teaching students ethics in the 21st century global market. Proc., Proceedings of the 2008 Mid-Atlantic Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education. Hoboken, NJ: ASEE 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Capaldi N. The role of the business ethicist. Ethical Perspectives. 12:3:371–383.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Casarett DJ, Daskal F, Lantos K. The authority of the clinical ethicist. Hastings Center Report. 28:6:6–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Churchill LR. The ethicist in professional education. Hastings Center Report. 13–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Glover JJ, Ozar DT, Thomasma DC. Teaching ethics on rounds: The ethicist as teacher, consultant, and decision-maker. Theoretical Medicine. 7:1:13–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Churchill LR. The ethicist in professional education. Hastings Center Report. 13–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Sands K, Pearce A. Toward a framework for construction ethics education: A meta-framework of construction ethics education topics. Proc. Construction Research Congress. Atlanta, GA, 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Glover JJ, Ozar DT, Thomasma DC. Teaching ethics on rounds: The ethicist as teacher, consultant, and decision-maker. Theoretical Medicine. 7:1:13–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Glover JJ, Ozar DT, Thomasma DC. Teaching ethics on rounds: The ethicist as teacher, consultant, and decision-maker. Theoretical Medicine. 7:1:13–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Glover JJ, Ozar DT, Thomasma DC. Teaching ethics on rounds: The ethicist as teacher, consultant, and decision-maker. Theoretical Medicine. 7:1:13–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Churchill LR. The ethicist in professional education. Hastings Center Report. 13–15.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.67
Loading

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error