1887

ملخص

Full research graduate degree programmes in engineering and science are a unique set of coordinated scientific activities with definite starting and finishing points to meet specific performance objectives within defined schedule, cost and performance parameters. Often in graduate engineering programmes, little emphasis is placed on proper research management before and during execution. This leads to improper management and overshooting deadlines, culminating in unnecessary stress on budgets, resources and time. In this article, we present a case study application of critical path method (CPM) scheduling without resource constraints in planning and managing a typical graduate chemical engineering research project. The case study describes a full MSc research degree programme that considers the synthesis and performance evaluation of a carbon nanotube-polyaspartamide (CNT-PAA) composite material for carbon dioxide capture from coal-fired power plants. Based on the approved project proposal, the scheduled project duration for completion of the degree programme is 104 weeks. However, results of the application of CPM scheduling to the project show expected project duration of ninety-four (94) weeks, indicating a reduction of about 10%. In the presence of unexpected variability in the activity time of the activities in the critical path (CP) during the life cycle of the project, the programme evaluation and review technique (PERT) reveals that there is 85 percent chance of completing the degree programme on, or before, the scheduled project deadline.

Loading

جارٍ تحميل قياسات المقالة...

/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.20
٢٠١٥-٠٨-٢٩
٢٠٢٤-١٢-٢٧
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qproc/2015/4/qproc.2015.elc2014.20.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.20&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Steyn H. Project Management: A multi-disciplinary approach. Pretoria South Africa: FPM Publishing 2009.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  2. Bisschoff T, Govender C, Oosthuizen P. Project management in education and training. Van Schaik Publishers 2004.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  3. Gray CF, Larson EW. Project management: The managerial process. Asia: McGraw-Hill 2010.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  4. Chatfield C, A short course in project management. 2010, March 26;, [online]. Available: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/project/HA102354821033.aspx .
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  5. Galloway PD. “Comparative study of university courses on critical path method scheduling”. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 2006;712722.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  6. Lu M, Lam H-C. Critical Path scheduling under resource calendar constraints. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 2008; 134::2531.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  7. Hegazy T. Optimization of resource allocation and levelling using genetic algorithms. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 1999; 125:3:167175.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  8. Bricknell L. Project planning: Part I. In: Oossthuizen TVenter R, eds. Project management in perspective. South Africa: Oxford University Press 2011.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  9. Hadju M. Network scheduling techniques for construction project management. Netherlands: Netherlands Kluwer Academic Publisher 1997.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.20
Loading
/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.20
Loading

جارٍ تحميل البيانات والوسائط...

هذه الخانة مطلوبة
يُرجى إدخال عنوان بريد إلكتروني صالح
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error