1887

Abstract

In 1993, the Foundation Coalition (FC) was formed to provide an innovative curriculum for freshman and sophomore engineering students in nine universities, including Texas A&M. FC themes include an integrated curriculum, active/cooperative learning, technology-enabled learning, and continuous improvement. For many years, FC was generously supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and produced numerous papers showing significant benefits, such as greater retention, improved academic performance, and more rapid graduation. Once NSF funding ended, Texas A&M institutional commitment to FC waned and the freshman engineering program fragmented into three tracks. Only Track C (chemical and petroleum engineering) continued the educational traditions established by FC. Because of transfers and changes of majors, not all students who enter the sophomore chemical engineering programs had Track C as freshman. This provides a unique opportunity to run “controlled studies” to determine the impact of FC principles on chemical engineering education. The data demonstrate that students who participated in Track C exhibited significantly better performance. For example, grades in the first chemical engineering course (mass and energy balances) increased by 0.45 grade points and the “recycle rate” for this course decreased by a factor of 2.6.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.76
2015-08-29
2024-12-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qproc/2015/4/qproc.2015.elc2014.76.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.76&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Al-Holou N, Bilgutay N, Corleto C, Demel JT, Felder R, Frair K, Froyd JE, Hoit M, Morgan J, Wells D. First-Year Integrated Curricula Across Engineering Education Coalitions, http://www.foundationcoalition.org/publications/journalpapers/AuthorHTML/F.htm .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Morgan J, Froyd J, Rinehart J, Kenimer A, Malave C, Caso R, Clark C. International Conference on Engineering Education, Manchester, U.K., August 18–21, 2002. Can Systemic Change Really Help Engineering Students from Under-Represented Groups?.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Caso R, Clark C, Froyd J, Inam A, Kenimer A, Morgan J, Rinehart J. A Systemic Change Model in Engineering Education and Its Relevance for Women. 2002;, Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Whiteacre M, Malave C. An Integrated Freshman Engineering Curriculum for Pre-calculus Students, http://www.foundationcoalition.org/publications/journalpapers/ AuthorHTML/W.htm.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Morgan J, Bolton R. An Integrated First-year Engineering Curricula, http://www.foundationcoalition.org/publications/journalpapers/AuthorHTML/M.htm .
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Morgan J. A Freshman Engineering Experience: The Foundation Coalition at Texas A&M University, http://www.foundationcoalition.org/publications/journalpapers/AuthorHTML/M.htm .
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Willson V, Monogue T, Malave C. First Year Comparative Evaluation of the Texas A&M Freshman Integrated Engineering Program, http://www.foundationcoalition.org/publications/journalpapers/AuthorHTML/M.htm .
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Barrow D, Bassichis B, DeBlassie D, Everett L, Imbrie PK, Whiteacre M. An Integrated Freshman Engineering Curriculum, Why You Need It and How To Design It, http://www.foundationcoalition.org/publications/journalpapers/AuthorHTML/W.htm .
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Holtzapple MT, Reece WD. Foundations of Engineering. 2nd Ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Holtzapple M, Toback K, Holtzapple C. Foundation Coalition: Impact on Chemical Engineering Education at Texas A&M University 20 Years Later, 6th First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, August 7 – 8, 2014, College Station, TX.
  11. Felder RM, Rousseau RW. Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes. 3rd Ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.76
Loading
/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.76
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error