oa Mapping the Gulfs of translation studies

References

1. Berman A. The Experience of the Foreign: Culture and Translation in Romantic Germany. Transl. A. Hayvaert. Albany: SUNY Press 1992.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bourdieu P, Wacquant L. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press 1992.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bourdieu P. Intellectual field and creative project. In: Young MFD, ed. Knowledge and control. New directions for the sociology of education. London: Collier-Macmillan 1971;:189–207.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bourdieu P. Homo Academicus. (Peter Collier, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press 1984.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bowker L. Computer-aided translation technology: A practical introduction. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press 2002.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Campbell S. English translation and linguistic hegemony in the global era. In: Anderman GRogers M, eds. In and out of English: For better or worse? Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters 2005;:27–38.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chesterman A. The memes of translation. The spread of ideas in translation theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1997.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chesterman A. Causes, translations, effects. Target. 1998; 10:2:201–230.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chesterman A. The empirical status of prescriptivism. Folia Translatologica. 1999; 6::9–19.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chesterman A. Consilience and Translation Studies. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses. 2005; 51::19–32.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chesterman A. Interpreting the Meaning of Translation Studies. In: Mickael Suominen et al. eds. A Man of Measure. Festschrift in Honour of Fred Karlsson on his 60th Birthday . Turku: Linguistic Association of Finland; 2006: 3–11.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chesterman A. The name and nature of translator studies. Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies. 2009; 42::13–22.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dawkins R. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1976/1989.
    [Google Scholar]
14. van Doorslaer L. Risking conceptual maps. Mapping as a keywords-related tool underlying the online Translation Studies Bibliography . Target. 2007; 19:2:217–233.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Friedrichs RW. A sociology of sociology. New York: Free Press 1970.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Furfey PH. The scope and method of sociology. A metasociological treatise. New York: Cooper Square Publishers (Original work published 1953) 1965.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gambier Y, van Doorslaer L. Introduction. Translation studies bibliography. Amsterdam: Benjamins 2004;. Retrieved June 2015 from https://benjamins.com/online/tsb/ .
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gile D. Observational studies and experimental studies in the investigation of conference interpreting. Target. 1998; 1998::69–93.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gile D, Hansen G. The editorial process through the looking glass. In: Gyde Hansen, Kisten Malmkær, eds. Claims, Changes and Challenges in Translation Studies, Amsterdam, John Benjamins; 2001:297–306.
20. Goodman D. George Ritzer. In: Ritzer G, ed. Encyclopedia of social theory. Vol. II. London: Sage Publications 2005;:650–651.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Görlach M, ed. English in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gouldner A. Enter Plato: Classical Greece and the origins of social theory. New York: Basic Books 1965.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gouldner A. The coming crisis of Western sociology. New York: Basic Books 1970.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Guldin R. Translation and Metaphor. London: Routledge 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Holmes J. The name and nature of translation studies. In: Venuti L, ed. The translation studies reader. London: Routledge 1972/2004;:172–200.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jääskeläinen R. Think-aloud protocols. In: Baker M, ed. The Routledge Encyclopedia of translation studies. London: Routledge 2001;:265–269.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jääskeläinen R. Think-aloud protocol studies into translation. Target. 2002; 14:1:107–136.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Latour B. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard: Harvard University Press 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Latour B. We have never been modern. Harvard: Harvard University Press 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
30. McCrum R. So, what's this Globish revolution? The Observer. 2006, December 3;:6. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2006/dec/03/features.review37 .
    [Google Scholar]
31. McCrum R. Globish. How English language became the world's language. Toronto: Doubleday Canada 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Munday J, ed. The Routledge companion to translation studies. London: Routledge 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Nida E. Toward a Science of Translating.
34. Ost F. Traduire. Défense et illustration du multilinguisme. Paris: Fayard 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Pym A. Method in translation history. Manchester: St Jerome 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pym A. Translation technology and training for intercultural dialogue: What to do when your translation memory won't talk with youRetrieved from http://usuaris.tinet.cat/apym/on-line/training/2007_tm_talk_to_me.pdf .
37. Pym A. Exploring Translation Theories. London: Routledge 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Pym A. The Moving Text. Localization, Translation and Distribution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Ricœur P. Reflections on the just. (D. Pellauer, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ritzer G. Sociology: A multiple paradigm science. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon 1975.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Ritzer G. Toward an integrated sociological paradigm: The search for an exemplar and an image of the subject matter. Boston: Allyn & Bacon 1981.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Ritzer, G. Sociological Metatheory: A Defense of a Subfield by a Delineation of Its Parameters. Sociological Theory, Autumn, 1988;62187–200.
43. Ritzer G. Metatheorizing in sociology. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Ritzer G, ed. Metatheorizing. Newbury Park, CA: Sage 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Ritzer G. The McDonaldization thesis. Explorations and extensions. London: Sage Publications 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Ritzer G, Zhao S, Murphy J. Metatheorizing in sociology. In: Turner J, ed. The handbook of sociological theory. New York: Springer 2006;:113–131.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Ritzer G. Metatheory. In: Ritzer G, ed. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of sociology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing 2007;:2964–2967.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Sin-Wai C, ed. The Routledge Encyclopedia of translation technology. London: Routledge 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Snell-Hornby M. The Turns of Translation Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Snell-Hornby M. Globish or multilingual: Translation studies quo vadis? . Paper presented at the CETRA international conference “Known Unknowns of Translation Studies”, K.U. Leuven2009, August;.
51. Susam-Sarajeva S. Is one case always enough? Perspectives: Studies in Translatology. 2001; 9:3:167–176.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Susam-Sarajeva S. A ‘multilingual’ and ‘international’ translation studies? In: Hermans T, ed. Crosscultural transgressions. Manchester: St Jerome 2002;:193–205.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Susam-Sarayeva S. The case study research method in translation studies. In: Mason I, ed. The interpreter and the translator trainer. Manchester: St Jerome 2009;:37–56.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Tymoczko M. Trajectories of Research in Translation Studies. META. 2005; 50:4:1082–1097.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Tymoczko M. Reconceptualizing western translation theory. Integrating non-western thought about translation. In: Hermans T, ed. Translating others. Vol. 1. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Tymoczko M. Enlarging translation, empowering translators. Manchester: St Jerome 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Venuti L. The scandals of translation. For an ethics of difference. London: Routledge 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Sperber D. Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Toury G. Descriptive translation studies – and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Villa F. Sociology and metasociology: A journey of over half a century. In: Misztal BVilla FWilliams ES, eds. Paul Hanly Furfey's quest for a good society (Ch. 3) . Washington, D.C: Dept. of Sociology and Life Cycle Institute, Catholic University of America: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy 2005. Retrieved from http://www.crvp.org/book/Series01/I-32/chapter-3.htm .
    [Google Scholar]
61. Wacquant LJD. Toward a reflexive sociology: A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu. In: Turner SP, ed. Social theory and sociology: The classics and beyond. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell 1996;:213–228.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Wagner E, Chesterman A. Can Theory Help Translators: A Dialogue between the Ivory Tower and the Wordface. London: Routledge 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Weinstein D, Weinstein MA. The postmodern discourse of metatheory. In: Ritzer G, ed. Metatheorizing. Newbury Park, CA: Sage 1992;:135–150.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Williams J, Chesterman A. The map. A beginner's guide to doing research in translation studies. Manchester: St Jerome 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Zhao S. Metatheorizing in sociology. In: Ritzer GSmart B, eds. Handbook of social theory. London: Sage Publications 2001;:386–394.
    [Google Scholar]