1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Qatar Medical Journal
  4. Volume 2016, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 2016, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0253-8253
  • EISSN: 2227-0426

Abstract

Standard Emergency Department (ED) operations goals include minimization of the time interval (tMD) between patients' initial ED presentation and initial physician evaluation. This study assessed factors known (or suspected) to influence tMD with a two-step goal. The first step was generation of a multivariate model identifying parameters associated with prolongation of tMD at a single study center. The second step was the use of a study center-specific multivariate tMD model as a basis for predictive marginal probability analysis; the marginal model allowed for prediction of the degree of ED operations benefit that would be affected with specific ED operations improvements. The study was conducted using one month (May 2015) of data obtained from an ED administrative database (EDAD) in an urban academic tertiary ED with an annual census of approximately 500,000; during the study month, the ED saw 39,593 cases. The EDAD data were used to generate a multivariate linear regression model assessing the various demographic and operational covariates' effects on the dependent variable tMD. Predictive marginal probability analysis was used to calculate the relative contributions of key covariates as well as demonstrate the likely tMD impact on modifying those covariates with operational improvements. Analyses were conducted with Stata 14MP, with significance defined at  < 0.05 and confidence intervals (CIs) reported at the 95% level. In an acceptable linear regression model that accounted for just over half of the overall variance in tMD (adjusted 2 0.51), important contributors to tMD included shift census ( = 0.008), shift time of day ( = 0.002), and physician coverage ( = 0.004). These strong associations remained even after adjusting for each other and other covariates. Marginal predictive probability analysis was used to predict the overall tMD impact (improvement from 50 to 43 minutes,  < 0.001) of consistent staffing with 22 physicians. The analysis identified expected variables contributing to tMD with regression demonstrating significance and effect magnitude of alterations in covariates including patient census, shift time of day, and number of physicians. Marginal analysis provided operationally useful demonstration of the need to adjust physician coverage numbers, prompting changes at the study ED. The methods used in this analysis may prove useful in other EDs wishing to analyze operations information with the goal of predicting which interventions may have the most benefit.

© 2016 Pathan, Bhutta, Moinudheen, Jenkins, Silva, Sharma, Saleh, Khudabakhsh, Irfan, Thomas, licensee HBKU Press.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2016.18
2017-02-24
2024-11-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qmj/2016/2/qmj.2016.18.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2016.18&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Rowe BH, Channan P, Bullard M, Blitz S, Saunders LD, Rosychuk RJ, Lari H, Craig WR, Holroyd BR. Characteristics of patients who leave emergency departments without being seen. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13::848–852.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Kennedy M, MacBean CE, Brand C, Sundararajan V, Mc DTD. Review article: Leaving the emergency department without being seen. Emerg Med Australas. 2008; 20::306–313.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Sorup CM, Jacobsen P, Forberg JL. Evaluation of emergency department performance – a systematic review on recommended performance and quality-in-care measures. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013; 21::62.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu S, Nie H, Huang W, Liu X, Luo L, Lau WB, Cao Y. Characteristics of patients who leave the emergency department without being seen: The first report in China. Emerg Med Australas. 2014; 26::243–248.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Fayyaz J, Khursheed M, Mir MU, Mehmood A. Missing the boat: Odds for the patients who leave ED without being seen. BMC Emerg Med. 2013; 13::1.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. McHugh M, Van Dyke KJ, Howell E, Adams F, Moss D, Yonek J. Changes in patient flow among five hospitals participating in a learning collaborative. J Healthc Qual. 2013; 35::21–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Carron PN, Yersin B, Trueb L, Gonin P, Hugli O. Missed opportunities: Evolution of patients leaving without being seen or against medical advice during a six-year period in a Swiss tertiary hospital emergency department. BioMed Res Int. 2014; 2014::690368.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Lucas J, Batt RJ, Soremekun OA. Setting wait times to achieve targeted left-without-being-seen rates. Am J Emerg Med. 2014; 32::342–345.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Stang AS, McCusker J, Ciampi A, Strumpf E. Emergency department conditions associated with the number of patients who leave a pediatric emergency department before physician assessment. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013; 29::1082–1090.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Wuerz RC, Milne LW, Eitel DR, Travers D, Gilboy N. Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument. Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7::236–242.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Elkum NB, Barrett C, Al-Omran H. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: Implementation in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. BMC Emerg Med. 2011; 11::3.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Williams R. Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. The STATA J. 2012; 12::308–331.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Pielsticker S, Whelan L, Arthur A, Thomas SH. Identifying patient door-to-room goals that minimize left-without-being-seen rates. West J Emerg Med. 2015; 16:5:611–618.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant R. Applied Logistic Regression. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Mitchell MN. Interpreting and Visualizing Regression Models Using STATA. 1st ed. College Station TX: Stata Press 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Ng Y, Lewena S. Leaving the paediatric emergency department without being seen: Understanding the patient and the risks. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012; 48::10–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Clarey AJ, Cooke MW. Patients who leave emergency departments without being seen: Literature review and English data analysis. Emerg Med J. 2012; 29::617–621.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Welch S, Dalto J. Improving door-to-physician times in 2 community hospital emergency departments. Am J Med Qual. 2011; 26::138–144.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Soremekun OA, Biddinger PD, White BA, Sinclair JR, Chang Y, Carignan SB, Brown DF. Operational and financial impact of physician screening in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30::532–539.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Whelan L, Burns B, Brantley M, Haas T, Arthur AO, Thomas SH. Mathematical modeling of the impact of hospital occupancy: When do dwindling hospital beds cause ED gridlock? Adv Emerg Med. 2014; 2014::5.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Soremekun OA, Capp R, Biddinger PD, White BA, Chang Y, Carignan SB, Brown DF. Impact of physician screening in the emergency department on patient flow. J Emerg Med. 2012; 43::509–515.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Soremekun OA, Terwiesch C, Pines JM. Emergency medicine: An operations management view. Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18::1262–1268.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Bartiaux M, Mols P. Prospective study of waiting time delays in a university hospital emergency department with a physician triage model. Rev Med Brux. 2013; 34::405–409.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Aacharya RP, Gastmans C, Denier Y. Emergency department triage: An ethical analysis. BMC Emerg Med. 2011; 11::16.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Cheng I, Lee J, Mittmann N, Tyberg J, Ramagnano S, Kiss A, Schull M, Kerr F, Zwarenstein M. Implementing wait-time reductions under Ontario government benchmarks (Pay-for-Results): A cluster randomized trial of the effect of a Physician-Nurse Supplementary Triage Assistance team (MDRNSTAT) on emergency department patient wait times. BMC Emerg Med. 2013; 13::17.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Milsten A, Klein J, Liu Q, Vibhakar N, Linder L. Retrospective analysis of quality improvement throughput measures at a high-volume community emergency department. J Healthc Qual. 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Han JH, France DJ, Levin SR, Jones ID, Storrow AB, Aronsky D. The effect of physician triage on emergency department length of stay. J Emerg Med. 2010; 39::227–233.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2016.18
Loading
Marginal analysis in assessing factors contributing time to physician in the Emergency Department using operations data
Qatar Medical Journal 2016, 18 (2016); https://doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2016.18
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2016.18
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2016.18
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ED operations data, ED physicians, Emergency Department and Qatar

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error