1887
Volume 2025, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0253-8253
  • EISSN: 2227-0426

Abstract

Endometrial osseous metaplasia (OM) is a rare condition characterized by the transformation of endometrial tissue into bone cells. Despite its rarity, OM remains a significant contributor to infertility. Although the underlying mechanism remains debatable, an association with previous abortions and curettage has been suggested.

We present two cases of OM presented to the infertility clinic and discuss their similarities and discrepancies in presentation and risk factors. A transvaginal ultrasound raises suspicion about the diagnosis of OM with a hyperechoic mass and post-acoustic shadowing. An office hysteroscopy showed white, mesh-like bony sheets. Both cases underwent operative hysteroscopy to address surgical challenges, and the two cases were followed postoperatively for one year.

A comprehensive literature review examined various aspects of OM, including diagnosis, therapeutic options, outcomes, prognosis, and follow-up. Our aim was to raise awareness of this intriguing condition by providing up-to-date knowledge and emphasizing the central role of hysteroscopy in diagnosis and treatment. Here, we present two cases with the same complaint, infertility. Moreover, although the same treatment method was used in both cases, only one achieved pregnancy. This highlights that OM is a possible underlying cause of infertility, in addition to considering other factors that contribute to the overall clinical picture.

OM should be considered in the evaluation of infertility despite its rarity, especially with hyperechoic lesions and acoustic shadowing on ultrasound examination. Hysteroscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis and therapeutic approaches. A complete understanding of the reasons that trigger its growth is crucial. To rule out other differential diagnosis, a holistic evaluation of the patient's history, imaging, and histopathological examination is needed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2025.24
2025-03-17
2025-04-02
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. Grigore M, Pristavu A, Gafitanu D. Ultrasound features of osseous metaplasia of the endometrium-Case series and review of the literature. Clin Imaging. 2018 Nov-Dec;52:260–263. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.08.006.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kadirogullari P, Seckin KD, Selcuki NFT. Osseous metaplasia of the endometrium and successful hysteroscopic resection: A video case and review of the literature. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2022 Nov 7; 11:(4):244–246. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_121_21 .
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Helmi, Z.R., Hameed, B.H. CYP24A1 gene expression in spermatozoa of human and other oxidation level controlling enzymes as biomarkers of infertility. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2022 Aug; 72:(Suppl 1):290–294. doi: 10.1007/s13224-021-01608-5 .
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Garzon S, Laganà AS, Carugno J, Font EC, Jimenez J, Kar S, et al. Osseous metaplasia of the endometrium: a multicenter retrospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Oct;265:150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.032 .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cayuela E, Vilanova J, del Río M, Heredia F, Acín L, Zarco P, et al. Endometrial osseous metaplasia. Hysteroscopy. 2018 Jan;683–687. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57559-9_60 .
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Wani AH, Parry AH, Feroz I, Jehangir M, Rashid M. Imaging of endometrial osseous metaplasia—an uncommon but treatable cause of infertility. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2020 Dec 11;25:35. doi: 10.1186/s43043-020-00045-0 .
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gulec UK, Parlakgumus HA, Kılıçdağ EB, Bolat F, Bagis T. Osseous metaplasia of the endometrium. BMJ Case Rep. 2010 Aug 19:2010:bcr0420102931. doi: 10.1136/bcr.04.2010.2931 .
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Weerakkody Y, Baba Y, Lawal K, et al. Endometrial osseous metaplasia. Reference article. Radiopaedia.org [online]. 24 Dec 2023. [Accessed on 6 Jul 2024]. Available from: doi: 10.53347/rID-96843 .
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Damiani GR, Di Gennaro D, Malvasi A, Vimercati A, Loizzi V, Gaetani M, et al. Endometrial osseous metaplasia: an hysteroscopic incidental finding–an overview. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Jun 16; 12:(4):243–245. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_89_22 .
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Nori W, Helmi ZR. Can follicular fluid 8-oxo-2’-deoxyguanosine predict the clinical outcomes in ICSI cycle among couples with normospermia male?. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023 Sep; 66:(5):430–440. doi: 10.5468/ogs.22170 .
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Helmi Z, Nori W. The effect of adipose tissue StAR gene expression on ICSI among polycystic ovarian syndrome cases and matched controls: a case-control study. Ital J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Mar; 36:(1):38–47. doi: 10.36129/jog.2023.106 .
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee JY, Lee HA, Kwon HM, Na SH, Hwang JY, Lee DH. A case of endometrial osseous metaplasia treated by hysteroscopic operation. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May 16; 55:(5):361–365. doi: 10.5468/KJOG.2012.55.5.361 .
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Venkatesh YS, Stephen SN, Subbaiah M, Badhe BA, Dorairajan G. Malakoplakia of endometrium with osseous metaplasia on evaluation of postmenopausal leukorrhea: a rare case report. J Midlife Health. 2021 Jul-Sep; 12:(3):237–240. doi: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_213_20 .
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Grigore M, Blidaru I, Iordache F. Intrauterine foreign bodies, other than contraceptive devices and systems, may affect fertility-report of two very different cases. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2014 Apr; 19:(2):141–143. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2013.856406 .
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ali AI, Hassan WN, Alrawi S. A copeptin as a predictor marker for insulin resistance among women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Current Women's Health Reviews. 2022 Nov 1; 18:(4):67-72. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404817666211208152049 .
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Patil SB, Narchal S, Paricharak DG, More SS. Endometrial osseous metaplasia: case report with literature review. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013 Nov; 3:(Suppl1):S10–S12. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.121209 .
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Guerra LF, Pessanha LB, Oliveira GA, Melo AM, Braga FS, Souza RS. Metaplasia óssea endometrial: aspecto ultrassonográfico, radiológico e histopatológico. Radiol Bras. 2016 Jan-Feb; 49:(1):62–63. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0032 .
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kapur A, Khan S, Sharma S. Osseous metaplasia of endometrium: the bony womb and its hysteroscopic management. J Gynecol Surg. 2021 Feb 10; 37:(1):40–43. doi: 10.1089/gyn.2020.0167 .
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tica VI, Postolache I, Boşoteanu M, Aschie M, Tica I, Orasanu CI, et al. Endometrial osseous metaplasia-a rare cause of infertility with unknown etiology. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Oct 10; 59:(10):1803. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101803 .
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Basu M, Mammen C, Owen E. Bony fragments in the uterus: an association with secondary subfertility. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct; 22:(4):402–406. doi: 10.1002/uog.221 .
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hwang WY, Suh DH, Kim K, No JH, Kim YB. Aspiration biopsy versus dilatation and curettage for endometrial hyperplasia prior to hysterectomy. Diagn Pathol. 2021 Jan 14; 16:(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13000-020-01065-0 .
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Al-Talib A, Nezhat F, Tulandi T. The role of hysteroscopy in diagnosis and management of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Surg. 2010 Jun 25;7:211–216. doi: 10.1007/s10397-010-0604-1 .
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sood A, Lewis E, Grey B, Mohiyiddeen L. Novel management of endometrial osseous metaplasia. World J Surg Surgical Res [online]. 2019 Nov 11;2:1164. Available from: https://www.surgeryresearchjournal.com/open-access/novel-management-of-endometrial-osseous-metaplasia-5298.pdf .
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2025.24
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2025.24
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error