oa Structured Multi-Skill Assessment (SMSA) in pharmacy: A contextual adaptation for authentic assessment for colleges of pharmacy and beyond

References

1. Monaghan MS, Vanderbush RE, McKay AB. Evaluation of clinical skills in pharmaceutical education: past, present and future. Am J Pharm Educ. 1995; 59:4:354–358.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
2. Gardner SF, Stowe CD, Hopkins DD. Comparison of traditional testing methods and standardized patient examinations for therapeutics. Am J Pharm Educ. 2001; 65:3:236–240.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
3. Stowe CD, Gardner SF. Real-time standardized participant grading of an objective structured clinical examination. Am J Pharm Educ. 2005; 69:3:272–276.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
4. Harden RM, Stevenson M, Downie WW, Wilson GM. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. Br Med J. 1975; 1:447–451.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
5. Harden RM. What is an OSCE? Med Teach. 1988; 10:1:19–22.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
6. Sturpe DA. Objective structured clinical examinations in Doctor of Pharmacy programs in the United States. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010; 74:8:148.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
7. Fielding DW, Page GG, Rogers WT, O'Byrne CC, Schulzer M, Moody KG, Dyer S. Application of objective structured clinical examinations in an assessment of pharmacists' continuing competency. Am J Pharm Educ. 1997;  61:2:117–125.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
8. Austin Z, O'Byrne C, Pugsley J, Munoz LQ. Development and validation processes for an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for entry-to-practice certification in pharmacy: the Canadian experience. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003; 67:3:76.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
9. Austin Z, Marini A, Croteau D, Violato C. Assessment of pharmacists' patient care competencies: Validity evidence from Ontario (Canada)'s quality assurance and peer review process. Pharm Educ. 2004; 4:1:23–32.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
10. Munoz LQ, O'Byrne C, Pugsley J, Austin Z. Reliability, validity, and generalizability of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for assessment of entry-to-practice in pharmacy. Pharm Educ. 2005; 5:1:33–43.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
11. Rutter PM. The introduction of observed structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) to the MPharm degree pathway. Pharm Educ. 2002; 1:2:173–180.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
12. Corbo M, Patel JP, Abdel Tawab R, Davies JG. Evaluating clinical skills of undergraduate pharmacy students using objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). Pharm Educ. 2006; 6:1:53–58.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
13. Awaisu A, Nik Mohamed MH, Al-Efan QAM. Perception of pharmacy students in Malaysia on the use of objective structured clinical examinations to evaluate competence. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007; 71:6:118.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
14. Awaisu A, Abd Rahman NS, Nik Mohamed MH, Rahman Bux SH, Mohamed Nazar NI. Malaysian pharmacy students' assessment of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Am J Pharm Educ. 2010; 74:2:34.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
15. Awaisu A, Nik Mohamed MH. Advances in pharmaceutical education: An experience with the development and implementation of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in an undergraduate pharmacy program. Pharm Educ. 2010; 10:1:32–38.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
16. Carpenter JL. Cost analysis of objective structured clinical examinations. Acad Med. 1995; 70:8:828–833.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
17. Barman A. Critiques on the objective structured clinical examination. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2005; 34:8:478–482.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
18. Kearney S. Improving engagement: the use of “Authentic self-and peer-assessment for learning” to enhance the student learning experience. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2013; 38:7:875–891.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
19. Stiggins RJ. Design and development of performance assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 1987; 6:3:33–42.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
20. Wiggins G. Educative Assessment. Designing Assessments To Inform and Improve Student Performance. 1997; Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id = ED418997 .
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
21. Ndoye A, Parker M. Creating and sustaining a culture of assessment. Planning for Higher Education. 2010; 38:2:28–39.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
22. Froestad W, Bakken P. Student involvement in quality assessments of higher education in the Nordic countries. Nordic Quality Assurance Network In Higher Education. 2004; Retrieved from http://www.nokut.no/documents/noqa/reports/student involvement in quality assessments of higher education in the nordic countries.pd.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
23. Astin AW, Banta TW, Cross PK, El-Khawas E, Ewell PT, Hutchings P, Wright BD. AAHE Assessment Forum 9 Principles of Good Practice for Assessing Student Learning. American Association for Higher Education. 1996; Retrieved from http://www.academicprograms.calpoly.edu/pdfs/assess/nine_principles_good_practice.pdf .
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
24. Nicol D. Principles of good assessment and feedback: theory and practice. From the REAP International Online Conference on Assessment Design for Learner Responsibility. 2007; 29th–31st May, 2007.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
25. Liu NF, Carless D. Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education. 2006; 11:3:279–290.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
26. Grunwald H, M W. Peterson. Factors that promote faculty involvement in and satisfaction with institutional and classroom student assessment. Research in Higher Education. 2003; 44:2:173–204.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
27. Nicol DJ, Macfarlane-Dick D. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education. 2006; 31:2:199–218.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
28. Gavriel J. Assessment for learning: a wider (classroom-researched) perspective is important for formative assessment and self-directed learning in general practice. Education for Primary Care. 2013; 24:2:93–96.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]