1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Doha International Family Institute Journal
  4. Volume 2024, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 2024, Issue 2
  • EISSN: 2309-3927

Abstract

This article presents a theoretical framework with analytical models for examining policy implementation. It combines a multi-perspective framework (rational and critical) to explore the rationality, dynamism, and complexity of the policy process. Public policy is designed to achieve specific goals, but its implementation must also address the evolving and conflicting interests of various stakeholders, which requires a critical approach. This approach helps in understanding the implementation process as a series of complex, interrelated actions and events. Therefore, this article presents research that uses a case study methodology with analytical models, allowing the researchers to collect and analyze data. The analytical models enabled them to examine variables and factors such as policy delivery structure, communication mechanisms, and environmental factors. For example, socioeconomic and political factors impacted and hindered the implementation process. In summary, this article highlights the significance of conducting research that uses a multi-perspective approach across various contexts and regions to analyze the process of education policy implementation.

© 2024 The Author(s), licensee HBKU Press.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/difi.2024.3
2024-12-31
2025-01-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/difi/2024/2/difi.2024.issue2.3.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/difi.2024.3&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aguilar, M. S., & Castaneda, A. (2022). Out of the public eye: Researching political factors that influence the implementation of research knowledge as part of educational reforms and mathematics textbooks. Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education, 2:(1), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1163/26670127-bja10001
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Andreini, D., Pedeliento, G., Zarantonello, L., & Solerio, C. (2019). Reprint of “A renaissance of brand experience: Advancing the concept through a multi-perspective analysis.” Journal of Business Research, 96:, 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.047
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrews, C. J. (2017). Rationality in policy decision making. In F. Fischer, & G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 187–198). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315093192
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayoub, S. A. (2022). The implementation of TES: A case study [Doctoral thesis, Western University]. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/9057/
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Birkland, T. A. (2019). An introduction to the policy process. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351023948
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cox, D., Cleak, H., Bhathal, A., & Brophy, L. (2021). Theoretical frameworks in social work. Social Work Education, 40:(1), 18–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2020.1745172
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Dana, T. (2020). Crony capitalism in the Palestinian Authority: A deal among friends. Third World Quarterly, 41:(2), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1618705
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Elmore, R. E. (2013). Organizational models of social program implementation. In M. Hill (Ed.), Policy process.Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315847290
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Elyan, R., & Al-Doulat, A. (2021). Evaluating the content of Palestinian Curricula in light of the sustainable development goals 2030. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 17:(41), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v17i41.687
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Figueiró, P. S., Neutzling, D. M., & Lessa, B. (2022). Education for sustainability in higher education institutions: A multi-perspective proposal with a focus on management education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 339:, 130539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130539
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Han, S., & Mills, D. (2021). ‘From point to the surface’: The role of policy experimentation in Chinese higher education reforms. British Journal of Educational Studies, 69:(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2020.1795079
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Heller, D. E., & Shaw, K. M. (2023). State postsecondary education research. Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003447092
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jenkins, W. I. (1978). Policy analysis: A political and organisational perspective. M. Robertson.
  14. Jones, T. (2013). Understanding education policy: The ‘Four Education Orientations’ framework. Springer. https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2017.2.7
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, J. (2016). Quest for world-class teacher education? Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0837-5
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Lunn, B.J., Ferguson, L. E., & Ryan, M. (2017). Changing teachers’ epistemic cognition: A new conceptual framework for epistemic reflexivity. Educational Psychologist, 52:(4), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1333430
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Nilsen, P. (2020). Making sense of implementation theories, models, and frameworks. In K. Pak, & M. S. Polikoff (Eds.), Implementation science 3.0 (pp. 53–79). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Paine, L. (2013). Exploring the interaction of global and local in teacher education: Circulating notions of what preparing a good teacher entails. In X. D. Zhu, & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Preparing teaching for the 21st century (pp. 119–140). Springer. https://doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36970-4_8
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Pak, K., Polikoff, M. S., Desimone, L. M., & Saldívar García, E. (2020). The adaptive challenges of curriculum implementation: Insights for educational leaders driving standards-based reform. AERA Open, 6:(2), 233285842093282. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420932828
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Papaioannou, E. (2023). Combining hermeneutic phenomenology and critical discourse analysis: A bricolage approach to research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37:(6), 1804–1821. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2023.2233923
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Pülzl, H., & Treib, O. (2017). Implementing public policy. In F. Fischer, & G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 115–134). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315093192
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8:(4), 538–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1541-0072.1980.tb01266.x
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Shalaby, M., Weiss, C., Lust, E., Kao, K., Vollmann, E., Bergh, S., Karmel, E. J., Bohn, M., Kherigi, I., & Kadirbeyoglu, Z. (2020). The dynamics of decentralization in the MENA: Processes, outcomes, and obstacles. Program on Governance and Local Development Working Paper No. 31. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3741934
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Shinn, C. (2012). Teacher education reform in Palestine: Policy challenges amid donor expectations. Comparative Education Review, 56:(4), 608–633. https://doi.org/10.1086/667434
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Stietz, J., Jauk, E., Krach, S., & Kanske, P. (2019). Dissociating empathy from perspective taking: Evidence from intra- and inter-individual differences research. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10:, 126. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00126
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Tie, Y. C., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Medicine, 7:(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Van der Merwe, S. E., Biggs, R., Preiser, R., Cunningham, C., Snowden, D. J., O’Brien, K., Jenal, M., Vosloo, M., Blignaut, S., & Goh, Z. (2019). Making sense of complexity: Using SenseMaker as a research tool. Systems, 7:(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems7020025
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6:(4), 445–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Varpio, L., Paradis, E., Uijtdehaage, S., & Young, M. (2020). The distinctions between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. Academic Medicine, 95:(7), 989–994. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003075
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Voisin, A., & Dumay, X. (2020). How do educational systems regulate the teaching profession and teachers’ work? A typological approach to institutional foundations and models of regulation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 96:, 103144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103144
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Waite, D., & Arar, K. (2020). Problematizing the social in social justice education. In R. Papa (Ed.), Handbook on promoting social justice in education (pp. 169–192). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14625-2_153
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Weiner, J. M., & Higgins, M. C. (2017). Where the two shall meet: Exploring the relationship between teacher professional culture and student learning culture. Journal of Educational Change, 18:(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9292-6
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang, Y. (2023). What are the core concerns of policy analysis? A multidisciplinary investigation based on in-depth bibliometric analysis (Version V2) [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/xzmvmn
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
/content/journals/10.5339/difi.2024.3
Loading
Toward a conceptual framework for policy implementation inquiry: A multi-perspective approach
Doha International Family Institute Journal 2024, 3 (2024); https://doi.org/10.5339/difi.2024.3
/content/journals/10.5339/difi.2024.3
/content/journals/10.5339/difi.2024.3
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): theoretical frameworks, analytical models, policy implementation analysis, multi-perspective, rational and critical perspective

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error