1887
2 - Qatar Health 2021 Conference abstracts
  • ISSN: 1999-7086
  • E-ISSN: 1999-7094

ملخص

Clinical trial registries ensure the transparency and accountability of clinical trials (CTs) internationally1–2. It is important to safeguard the public's safety through the delivery of quality clinical research. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic there has been a tremendous increase in the number of CTs globally. The MENA region has an opportunity to increase its overall contribution to CTs, which is less than 1%3, in particular, through Qatar given its substantial economical growth and healthcare advancements. This review aims to explore the characteristics of clinical trials performed in Qatar, registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. The ClinicalTrials.gov registry was searched for trials conducted in Qatar using the appropriate keywords and advanced search options. Data retrieved was downloaded and sorted within Microsoft Excel then reviewed by two independent co-investigators. The preliminary search yielded 143 entries with 32.1% (46) registered as multisite trials. The first trial in Qatar was registered in 2005. There has been a noticeable increase in CTs with its peak in 2020 (Figure 1), with currently 39.1% (9) of registered CTs on COVID-19; 83% of the completed studies were published, with the highest number of publications (8) in 2020 (Figure 1). Several specialties contributed to the CTs, with the highest participation and contribution rate of 31 CTs being in the field of pediatrics. Furthermore, some variations were found in recruitment status as reflected in Figure 2 with ∼65% (93) of studies being interventional and ∼35% being observational. The CTs conducted in Qatar are still relatively low despite the rapidly evolving healthcare system. Immediate updates and follow-ups could be considered by research investigators in Qatar with regards to CTs registration and updating. Further analysis is needed to elucidate the discrepancy of CTs reporting and to increase the contribution of CTs from Qatar to improve the health of its people.

Loading

جارٍ تحميل قياسات المقالة...

/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2021.qhc.34
٢٠٢١-٠٨-٣١
٢٠٢٤-٠٧-٠٤
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jemtac/2021/2/jemtac.2021.qhc.34.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2021.qhc.34&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Zeeneldin AA, Taha FM, . The Egyptian clinical trials’ registry profile: Analysis of three trial registries (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry and clinicaltrials.gov). J Adv Res. 2016; 7:(1):37–45.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  2. Serpas VJ, Raghav KP, Halperin DM, Yao J, Overman MJ, . Discrepancies in endpoints between clinical trial protocols and clinical trial registration in randomized trials in oncology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18:(1):169.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  3. Ibrahim H, Kamour AM, Harhara T, Gaba WH, Nair SC, . Covid-19 pandemic research opportunity: Is the Middle East & North Africa (MENA) missing out?. Contemporary Clin Trials. 2020Aug 8:106106.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2021.qhc.34
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2021.qhc.34
Loading

جارٍ تحميل البيانات والوسائط...

  • نوع المستند: Conference Abstract
الموضوعات الرئيسية clinical trialsmedicineQatar and registry

الأكثر اقتباسًا لهذا الشهر Most Cited RSS feed

هذه الخانة مطلوبة
يُرجى إدخال عنوان بريد إلكتروني صالح
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error