oa Evaluation of the internal fit of zirconia crowns supported by metal implant abutments using different scanning aid agents through 3D analysis

References

1. El-Dessouky A, Salama MM, Shakal MA, Korsel AM. Marginal Adaptation of CAD/CAM Zirconia-Based Crown During Fabrication Steps. Tanta Dent J. 2015; 12:(2):81–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tdj.2014.12.002
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
2. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in Measurement of Marginal Fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62:405–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
3. Mosa MO, Ibraheem AF, Hussein HM. Digital Evaluation of the Trueness and Fitting Accuracy of a Three-Unit Fixed Zirconium Bridge Fabricated from Different Types of Zirconia and Different Marginal Cement Space Thickness. Eur J Gen Dent. 2024; 13:(1):30–6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777010
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
4. Kahdim AKJ. Comparison the Marginal and Internal Fitness of Veneered and Anatomical Zirconia Crowns Milled by Two Different CAD/CAM Systems (An in Vitro Study). Mustansiryiah Dent J. 2022; 18:(2):238–44. https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v18i2.926
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
5. Naik VB, Jain AK, Rao RD, Naik BD. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Ceramic and Resin Inlays, Onlays, and Overlays: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2022; 25: 347–55:. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_184_22
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
6. Çin V, İzgi AD, Kale E, Yilmaz B. Marginal and Internal Fit of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Fabricated by Using Two Different CAD-CAM Workflows: An In Vitro Study. Prosthesis. 2023; 5:35–47. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5010003
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
7. Srimaneepong V, Heboyan A, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Marya A, Fernandes GVO, Rokaya D. Fixed Prosthetic Restorations and Periodontal Health: A Narrative Review. J Funct Biomater. 2022; 13:(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13010015
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
8. Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mormann WH, Reich S, Kadhum R. Intraoral Scanning Systems - A Current Overview. Int J Comput Dent. 2015; 18:(2):101–29.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
9. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques: Evaluation of Patients’ Perception, Treatment Comfort, Effectiveness, and Clinical Outcomes. BMC Oral Health. 2014; 14:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-10
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
10. Lim JH, Mangal U, Nam NE, Choi SH, Shim JS, Kim JE. A Comparison of Accuracy of Different Dental Restorative Materials between Intraoral Scanning and Conventional Impression-Taking: An In Vitro Study. Materials. 2021; 14:(8):2060. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14082060
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
11. Oh HS, Lim YJ, Kim B, Kim MJ, Kwon HB, Baek YW. Effect of Scanning-Aid Agents on the Scanning Accuracy in Specially Designed Metallic Models: A Laboratory Study. PLoS One. 2022May5; 17:(5):e0267742. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267742
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
12. Motel Constantin E, Kirchner E, Adler W, Wichmann M, Matta RE. Impact of Different Scan Bodies and Scan Strategies on the Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Assessed with an Intraoral Scanner: An In Vitro Study. J Prosthodont. 2019; 29:(4):309–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13131
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
13. Jang D, Son K, Lee K-B. A Comparative Study of the Fitness and Trueness of a Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Fabricated Using Two Digital Workflows. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019; 11:(5):277–84. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9142778
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
14. Lee K, Son K, Lee KB. Effects of Trueness and Surface Microhardness on the Fitness of Ceramic Crowns. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020; 10:1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10051858
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
15. Ali Majeed Z, Hasan Jasim H. Digital Evaluation of Trueness and Fitting Accuracy of Co-Cr Crown Copings Fabricated by Different Manufacturing Technologies. Cureus. 2023Jun1; 15:(6):e39819. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39819
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
16. Rutkūnas V, Gečiauskaitė A, Jegelevičius D, Vaitiekūnas M. Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions with Intraoral Scanners. A Systematic Review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017; 10:(Suppl. 1):101–20.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
17. Pedroche LO, Bernardes SR, Leão MP, Kintopp CC, Correr GM, Ornaghi BP, et al. Marginal and Internal Fit of Zirconia Copings Obtained Using Different Digital Scanning Methods. Braz Oral Res. 2016; 30:e113. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0113
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
18. Nejatidanesh F, Shakibamehr AH, Savabi O. Comparison of Marginal and Internal Adaptation of CAD/CAM and Conventional Cement Retained Implant-Supported Single Crowns. Implant Dent. 2016Feb; 25:(1):103–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000346
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
19. Prudente MS, Davi LR, Nabbout KO, Prado CJ, Pereira LM, Zancopé K, et al. Influence of Scanner, Powder Application, and Adjustments on CAD-CAM Crown Misfit. J Prosthet Dent. 2018Mar; 119:(3):377–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.024
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
20. Att W, Hoischen T, Gerds T, Strub JR. Marginal Adaptation of All-Ceramic Crowns on Implant Abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008Dec; 10:(4):218–25. 1https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00079.x
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
21. Zeller S. Accuracy of Three Digital Workflows for Implant Abutment and Crown Fabrication Using a Digital Measuring Technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121:(2):276–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.026
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
22. Wang H, Feng Q, Li N, Xu S. Evaluation of Metal-Ceramic Bond Characteristics of Three Dental Co-Cr Alloys Prepared with Different Fabrication Techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2016Dec;116(6):916–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.06.002
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
23. Moris IC, Faria AC, Ribeiro RF, Rodrigues RC. Abutments with Reduced Diameter for Both Cement and Screw Retentions: Analysis of Failure Modes and Misfit of Abutment-Crown-Connections After Cyclic Loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017Apr; 28:(4):432–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12816
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
24. Pan Y, Tsoi JK, Lam WY, Pow EH. Implant Framework Misfit: A Systematic Review on Assessment Methods and Clinical Complications. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021Apr; 23:(2):244-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12968
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
25. Kirschneck C, Kamuf B, Putsch C, Chhatwani S, Bizhang M, Danesh G. Conformity, Reliability and Validity of Digital Dental Models Created by Clinical Intraoral Scanning and Extraoral Plaster Model Digitization Workflows. Comput Biol Med. 2018Sep1; 100:114–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.06.035
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
26. Vlaar ST, van der Zel JM. Accuracy of Dental Digitizers. Int Dent J. 2006; 56:(5):301–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2006.tb00105.x
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
27. Agustín-Panadero R, Moreno DM, Pérez-Barquero JA, Fernández-Estevan L, Gómez-Polo M, Revilla-León M. Influence of Type of Restorative Materials and Surface Wetness conditions on Intraoral Scanning Accuracy. J Dent. 2023; 134:104521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104521
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
28. Ren X, Son K, Lee KB. Accuracy of Proximal and Occlusal Contacts of Single Implant Crowns Fabricated Using Different Digital Scan Methods: An In Vitro Study. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14:2843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14112843
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
29. Qian K, Li B, Pu T, Bai T, Liu Y. Fitness of Self-Glazed Zirconia Onlays Using Conventional and Digital Impressions. Adv Appl Ceram. 2022; 121:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2022.2069988
    [Google الباحث العلمي]