oa ICT in engineering educational content delivery: Challenges and opportunities

References

1. Czerniewicz L, Brown C. The uses of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in teaching and learning in South African higher education practices in the Western Cape. Perspect Educ. 2005; 23:4:1–18.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Hammond N, Bennett C. Discipline differences in role and use of ICT to support group-based learning. J Comput Assist Lear. 2002; 18:1:55–63.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Williams D, Coles L, Wilson K, Richardson A, Tuson J. Teachers and ICT: current use and future needs. Brit J Educ Technol. 2000; 31:4:307–320.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brown C, Czerniewicz L. Disciplinary differences in the use of educational technology. e/merge 2006 Conference: Southern Africa, 10–21 July 2006.
5. UNESCO Report. Engineering: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities for Development. UNESCO Publishing 2010.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kabouridis G. An assessment of ICT-based education for mechanical engineering in TEI Patras Greece. Proceedings of the 6^th International Conference in Networked Learning. 2008;:829–835. ISBN 978-1-86220206-1.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Braz MHLB, Siqueira SWM, Melo RN. Information and Communication Technology for Supporting Civil Engineering Education. International Conference on Engineering Education. Valencia, Spain, July, 2003.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Anis H. E-learning in engineering education – General challenges and the Egyptian experience. In: Education in a Changing Environment (ECE) 6th International Conference: Creativity and Engagement in Higher Education. Greater Manchester, UK: The University of Salford 6–8 July 2011.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Zacharia ZC. Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits. J Comput Assist Lear. 2007; 23:2:120–132.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Zacharia ZC, Olympiou G, Papaevripidou M. Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students' conceptual understanding in heat and temperature. J Res Sci Teach. 2008; 45:9:1021–1035.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Winn W, Stahr F, Sarason C, Fruland R, Oppenheimer P, Lee Y-L. Learning oceanography from a computer simulation compared with direct experience at sea. J Res Sci Teach. 2006; 43::25–42.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Olympiou G, Zacharia ZC. Implementing a blended combination of physical and virtual laboratory manipulatives to enhance students' learning through experimentation in the domain of Light and Color. J Educ Inform Cybern. 2010; 2:1:49–53, ISDN: 1943-7978.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kulacki FA, Krueger ER. International Trends in Engineering Education. In: Scvarda LC, ed. Proceedings, International Conference on Engineering Education. 1998;. Pontifical Catholic University, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil (CD ROM Format). Journal of Education, Informatics and Cybernetics, Vol 2, No. 1, pp 49 -53, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
14. ABET – Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Engineering Accreditation Commissions Publications. USA. 2009.
15. Lioyd-Smith L. Exploring the Advantages of Blended Instruction at Community Colleges and Technical schools. MERLOT J Online Lear Teach. June 2010; 6:2.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Elaine Allen I, Seaman J, Garret R. Blending in: The Extent and Promise of Blended Education in the United States. Needham, MA: Available at: http://sloanconsortium.org/site/default/files/Blending_In.pdf  Sloan Consortium 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
17. McCormick R, Scrimshaw P. Information and communication technology, knowledge and pedagogy. Commun Inform. 2001; 1::37–57.
    [Google Scholar]