1887

ملخص

Well-prepared human capital in research and development is one of the key pillars that support knowledge and innovation. Therefore, a well-educated engineering workforce is essential to undertake those grand challenges. We note that in our engineering institutions in Morocco, there is a big gap between how engineering is actually taught and the interesting immaterial capital of research knowledge and productivity. Reducing this gap requires global motivation, innovation and collaboration from engineering educators and researchers. However, effective curriculum innovation is required to better respond to new demands of engineering in our economy. One of the most widespread teaching strategies is the promotion of engineering education through research: bringing research into the classroom and involving students in research projects.

Training through research is a fundamental process of transferring knowledge and skills from engineering educators to undergraduates. However, making the correlation between research productivity and teaching activities is not an obvious task. In this paper, we present our fundamental engineering education strategic process for bridging the gap between these elements. A case study is proposed of how we could exploit the results of our research in engineering education. Thanks to the robustness of our approach and the motivation of our students, developing innovative and intelligent multi-agent applications based on distributed constraints reasoning techniques is now possible in our classrooms.

Loading

جارٍ تحميل قياسات المقالة...

/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.36
٢٠١٥-٠٨-٢٩
٢٠٢٤-٠٧-٠٥
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qproc/2015/4/qproc.2015.elc2014.36.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.36&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Rugarcia A. The Link Between Teaching and Research: Myth or Possibility? Engineering Education. 1991; 81::2022.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  2. Felder RM. The Myth of the Superhuman Professor. Journal of Engineering Education. 1994; 83::105110, http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/Mythpap.html .
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  3. Prince Michael J, Felder Richard M, Brent Rebecca. Does Faculty Research Improve Undergraduate Teaching? An Analysis of Existing and Potential Synergies. Journal of Engineering Education. 2007; 96:4:283294.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  4. Sabitini DA. Teaching and Research Synergism: The Undergraduate Research Experience. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 1997; 123::98102.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  5. Pocklinton T, Tupper A. No Place to Learn. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press 2002.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  6. Colbeck CL. Merging in a Seamless Blend: How Faculty Integrate Teaching and Research. Journal of Higher Education. 1998; 69::647671.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  7. Roman Barták. Guide to Constraint Programming. http://ktiml.mff.cuni.cz/∼bartak/constraints/intro.html  1998.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  8. Yokoo M, Durfee EH, Ishida T, Kuwabara K. Distributed constraint satisfaction for formalizing distributed problem solving. International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. 1992;614621.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  9. Yokoo M, Durfee EH, Ishida T, Kuwabara K. The distributed constraint satisfaction problem: formalization and algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 1998; 10:5:673685.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.36
Loading
/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.36
Loading

جارٍ تحميل البيانات والوسائط...

هذه الخانة مطلوبة
يُرجى إدخال عنوان بريد إلكتروني صالح
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error