1887
Volume 2025, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0253-8253
  • EISSN: 2227-0426

Abstract

Language barriers significantly impact healthcare delivery, particularly in emergency medical services (EMS) operating in linguistically diverse environments. The demographic composition of Qatar, with its predominantly expatriate population, presents unique challenges for effective communication in pre-hospital care settings. The aim of this was to assess the opinions of personnel from the Hamad Medical Corporation Ambulance Service (HMCAS) regarding the impact of language barriers on pre-hospital emergency care.

A cross-sectional study was conducted using an anonymous survey with a five-point Likert scale among 312 frontline personnel of HMCAS. Fisher's exact and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare ordinal outcomes across groups. Machine learning algorithms, including ordinal logistic regression, support vector machines (SVM), and naive Bayes, were used to develop predictive models for HMCAS staff opinions on their language learning needs.

Both bivariate and multivariate analyses revealed significant differences in the frequency of experiencing communication challenges. The most influential factors identified were strong opinions on language barriers and the willingness of staff to enhance their language skills. Variables related to using family members as interpreters showed relatively low importance. The SVM model demonstrated the best predictive capability concerning staff perceptions about language learning needs, with an accuracy of 0.50 and an average area under the curve score of 0.74.

Language barriers significantly impact pre-hospital emergency care in Qatar. The findings highlight the need for targeted interventions, such as language training programs and mobile translation apps. These strategies could enhance communication in multicultural EMS settings, improving patient care and reducing miscommunication risks. Future research should evaluate the long-term impact of these interventions on patient outcomes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2025.19
2025-03-17
2025-04-06
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. Maddry JK, Simon EM, Reeves LK, Mora AG, Clemons MA, Shults NM, et al. Impact of a standardized patient hand-off tool on communication between Emergency Medical Services Personnel and Emergency Department Staff. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 Jul-Aug; 25:(4)530–8. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1808745.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Breyre AM, Benesch T, Glomb NW, Sporer KA, Anderson WG. EMS Experience caring and communicating with patients and families with a life-limiting-illness. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022 Sep-Oct; 26:(5)708–15. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1994674.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Globalmediainsight. Qata. Population Statistics 2024 [Infographics] [online]. Official GMI Blog. 2024 [cited 28 Jun 2024]. Available from: https://www.globalmediainsight.com/blog/qatar-population-statistics/.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Farhat H, Alinier G, El Aifa K, Makhlouf A, Gangaram P, Howland I, et al. Epidemiology of pre-hospital emergency calls according to patient transport decision in a middle eastern emergency care environment: Retrospective cohort-based. Health Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 23; 7:(4)e2056. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2056.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Al-Thani H, El-Menyar A, Consunji R, Mekkodathil A, Peralta R, Allen KA, et al. Epidemiology of occupational injuries by nationality in Qatar: Evidence for focused occupational safety programmes. Injury. 2015 Sep; 46:(9)1806–13. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.04.023.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tate RC. The need for more pre-hospital research on language barriers: A narrative review. West J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec; 16:(7)1094–105. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.8.27621.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Meischke HW, Calhoun RE, Yip MP, Tu SP, Painter IS. The effect of language barriers on dispatching EMS response. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Oct-Dec; 17:(4)475–80. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.811565.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Demir S, Tunçbilek Z, Alinier G. Pre-hospital emergency health services in Qatar. J Paramed Pract. 2022 Nov 23; 14:(11)456–62. doi: 10.12968/jpar.2022.14.11.456.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Newspaper TP. Hamad Medical Corporation's Ambulance Service earns fourth consecutive international accreditation [online]; 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 29]. Available from: https://thepeninsulaqatar.com/article/04/05/2024/hamad-medical-corporations-ambulance-service-earns-fourth-consecutive-international-accreditation.
  10. Gangaram P, Menacho AM, Alinier G. Crisis resource management in relation to empowering people to speak up in emergency medical service clinical practice settings. J Paramed Pract. 2017 Feb 10; 9:(2)60–5. doi: 10.12968/jpar.2017.9.2.60.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Consunji RJ, Mehmood A, Hirani N, El-Menyar A, Abeid A, Hyder AA, et al. Occupational safety and work-related injury control efforts in Qatar: lessons learned from a rapidly developing economy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 21; 17:(18)6906. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186906.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang X, Cheng Z. Cross-sectional studies: strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest. 2020 Jul; 158:(1S):S65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Farhat H, Makhlouf A, Gangaram P, Aifa KE, Khenissi MC, Howland I, et al. Exploring factors influencing time from dispatch to unit availability according to the transport decision in the pre-hospital setting: an exploratory study. BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 29; 24:(1)77. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00992-1.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Farhat H, Alinier G, Gangaram P, El Aifa K, Khenissi MC, Bounouh S, et al. Exploring pre-hospital healthcare workers’ readiness for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threats in the State of Qatar: a cross-sectional study. Health Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 30; 5:(5)e803. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.803.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fornæss KM, Nome PL, Aakre EK, Hegvik TA, Jammer I. Clinical frailty scale: inter-rater reliability of retrospective scoring in emergency abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Jan; 66:(1)25–9. doi: 10.1111/aas.13974.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Javali RH, Loganathan A, Srinivasarangan M, Patil A, Siddappa GB, Satyanarayana N, et al. Reliability of emergency department diagnosis in identifying the etiology of nontraumatic undifferentiated hypotension. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 May; 24:(5)313–20. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23429.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Saffari SE, Ning Y, Xie F, Chakraborty B, Volovici V, Vaughan R, et al. AutoScore-ordinal: an interpretable machine learning framework for generating scoring models for ordinal outcomes. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 4; 22:(1)286. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01770-y.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Pereira-Maxwell F. Medical statistics: an A-Z companion. 2nd ed. CRC Press; 2018. 417 p.
  19. Farhat H, Makhlouf A, Gangaram P, El Aifa K, Howland I, Babay E, Rekik F, et al. Predictive modelling of transport decisions and resources optimisation in pre-hospital setting using machine learning techniques. PLoS One. 2024 May 3; 19:(5)e0301472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301472.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Corbière M, Larivière N. Méthodes qualitatives et mixtes: Dans la recherche en sciences humaines, sociales et de la santé [online]. Presses de l'Université du Québec; 2014. 820 p. Available from: https://www.puq.ca/catalogue/livres/methodes-qualitatives-quantitatives-mixtes-edition-3773.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Alinier G, Wilson P, Reimann T, Morris B. Influential factors on urban and rural response times for emergency ambulances in Qatar. Mediterr J Emerg Med [online]. 2018 [cited 2022 Aug 8];(26):8–13. Available from: https://www.mjemonline.com/index.php/mjem/article/view/82.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hodell E, Hughes SD, Corry M, Kivlehan S, Resler B, Sheon N, et al. Paramedic perspectives on barriers to pre-hospital acute stroke recognition. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016 May-Jun; 20:(3)415–24. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1115933.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mustafa R, Mahboob U, Khan RA, Anjum A. Impact of language barriers in doctor – patient relationship: a qualitative study. Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Jan-Feb; 39:(1)41–5. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.1.5805.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ji X, Chow E, Abdelhamid K, Naumova D, Mate KKV, Bergeron A, et al. Utility of mobile technology in medical interpretation: a literature review of current practices. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep; 104:(9)2137–45. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.019.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hwang K, Williams S, Zucchi E, Chong TWH, Mascitti-Meuter M, LoGiudice D, et al. Testing the use of translation apps to overcome everyday healthcare communication in Australian aged-care hospital wards—an exploratory study. Nurs Open. 2022 Jan; 9:(1)578–85. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1099.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. de Moissac D, Bowen S. Impact of language barriers on quality of care and patient safety for official language minority francophones in Canada. J Patient Exp. 2019 Mar; 6:(1)24–32. doi: 10.1177/2374373518769008.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Tate RC, Hodkinson PW, Meehan-Coussee K, Cooperstein N. Strategies used by pre-hospital providers to overcome language barriers. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016 May-Jun; 20:(3)404–14. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1102994.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Perera N, Birnie T, Ngo H, Ball S, Whiteside A, Bray J, et al. “I'm sorry, my English not very good”: tracking differences between language-barrier and non-language-barrier emergency ambulance calls for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2021 Dec:169:105–12. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.035.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Chauhan A, Walton M, Manias E, Walpola RL, Seale H, Latanik M, et al. The safety of health care for ethnic minority patients: a systematic review. Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jul 8; 19:(1)118. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01223-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Seible DM, Kundu S, Azuara A, Cherry DR, Arias S, Nalawade VV, et al. The influence of patient–provider language concordance in cancer care: results of the Hispanic outcomes by language approach (HOLA) randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Nov 15; 111:(4)856–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.122.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lion KC, Lin YH, Kim T. Artificial intelligence for language translation: the equity is in the details. JAMA. 2024 Nov 5; 332:(17)1427–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.15296.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Šveda P, Djovčoš M. Translation and interpretation in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study from Slovakia. STRIDON J Stud Transl Interpret. 2022 Nov 30; 2:(2)25–43. doi: 10.4312/stridon.2.2.25-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Al Shamsi H, Almutairi AG, Al Mashrafi S, Al Kalban. T. Implications of language barriers for healthcare: a systematic review. Oman Med J. 2020 Apr 30; 35:(2)e122. doi: 10.5001/omj.2020.40.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hsieh E, Kramer EM. Medical interpreters as tools: dangers and challenges in the utilitarian approach to interpreters’ roles and functions. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct; 89:(1)158–62. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.07.001.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Joensuu R, Suleiman K, Koskenranta M, Kuivila H, Oikarainen A, Juntunen J, et al. Factors associated with the integration of culturally and linguistically diverse nurses into healthcare organisations: a systematic review of quantitative studies. J Nurs Manag [online]. 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 5]; 2024:(1)5887450. doi: org/10.1155/2024/5887450.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Khatri RB, Assefa Y. Access to health services among culturally and linguistically diverse populations in the Australian universal health care system: issues and challenges. BMC Public Health. 2022 May 3; 22:(1)880. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13256-z.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Akdeniz C. Kaizen philosophy explained. Can Akdeniz. 2015; 27 p.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2025.19
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2025.19
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cultural diversityLanguage barrierslinguistic challengesMiddle Eastern EMS and pre-hospital care
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error