1887
  1. الرئيسية
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care
  4. المجلد 2024, العدد 2
  5. المقالة
2 - Unified National Conference of Iraqi Dental Colleges (UNCIDC)
  • ISSN: 1999-7086
  • E-ISSN: 1999-7094

ملخص

One of the critical factors for dental implant success is accurate clinical and radiological assessment. Cone-beam computed tomography systems (CBCT) allow surgeons to determine the quality and quantity before surgery, aiding in treatment planning. This study highlights the importance of such an assessment.

A total of 40 patients were referred to CBCT scanning for pre-dental implant assessment in the Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology department at Al-Shaheed Gazi Al Hariri Hospital from 2021 to 2022. The patients were between 18 and 50 years old. All data were analyzed with on-demand 3D software (Kavo OP 3D: Cone Beam 3D imaging Germany).

Regarding the ridge shape:

  1. In the upper anterior and posterior regions, the rectangular shape had the highest percentages of (62.5%) and (75%) respectively.
  2. In the lower anterior and posterior regions, the pyramidal shape had the highest percentages of (55%) and (60%), respectively, and the hourglass shape was the lowest in all areas.

Regarding bone density:

The highest bone density percentage in the anterior upper region was D3 (67%), while in the upper posterior region, D4 had the highest percentage (77.5%). In the lower anterior region, D2 had a more prominent percentage (52.5%), while in the lower posterior, D3 was predominant (82.6%).

From this study, it can be suggested that CBCT is the best modality for pre-implant radiographic assessment, and ridge shape and bone density are easily assessed using this method.

© 2024 Hadi, Ali, Alghurabi, licensee HBKU Press.
Loading

جارٍ تحميل قياسات المقالة...

/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2024.uncidc.1
٢٠٢٤-٠١-٢٤
٢٠٢٤-٠٧-٠٥
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jemtac/2024/2/jemtac.2024.uncidc.1.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2024.uncidc.1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Gulsahi A. Bone Quality Assessment for Dental Implants. In: Turkyilmaz I, editor. Implant Dentistry - The Most Promising Discipline of Dentistry. 1st ed. Croatia: InTech Open Access Publisher; 2011. p. 437-52.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  2. Mupparapu M, Singer SR. Implant imaging for the dentist. JCan Dent Assoc 2004; 70::32.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  3. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent. 2008 Mar; 17:(1):5-15. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181676059.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  4. Araby Y, Zakaria W, Ramadan M, Salem W. Assessment of the effect of implant recipient site’s bone density on initial implant stability in the anterior mandibular region. J Am Sci, 2017; 13:(10):103-109. doi: 10.7537/marsjas131017.12.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  5. Misch CE. In: Dental implant prosthetics. 1st ed. St Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2004. p. 59-63.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  6. Lingeshwar D, Dhanasekar B, Aparna IN. Diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implantol Clin Res. 2010; 1::147-53.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  7. Berg H, Carlsson GE, Helkimo M. Changes in shape of posterior parts of upper jaws after extraction of teeth and prosthetic treatment. J Prosthet Dent. 1975 Sep; 34:(3):262-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(75)90102-x.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  8. Clark DE, Danforth RA, Barnes RW, Burtch ML. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: a comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques. J Oral Implantol. 1990; 16:(3):156-64.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  9. Lam RV. Contour changes of alveolar process following extraction. J Prosth Dent. 1960; 10:(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(60)90083-4.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  10. Schwarz MS, Rothman SL, Chafetz N, Rhodes M. Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 1989 Oct; 33:(4):555-97.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  11. McGivney GP, Haughton V, Strandt JA, Eichholz JE, Lubar DM. A comparison of computer-assisted tomography and data-gathering modalities in prosthodontics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986 Summer; 1:(1):55-68.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  12. Turkyilmaz I, Tözüm TF, Tumer C. Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography. J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Apr; 34:(4):267-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01689.x.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  13. Misch CE. Bone density: a key determinant for clinical success. In: Misch CE, editor. Dental implant prosthetics. Maryland Heights: Mosby; 2005. p. 130-141.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  14. Sevimay M, Turhan F. Three-dimensional finite element analysis on the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in implant-supported crown. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93::227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.019.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  15. Papavasilion G, Kamposiors P, Bayne SC, Felton DA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76::633-640. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90442-4.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  16. Atwood DA. Reduction of residual ridges: a major oral disease entity. J Prosthet Dent. 1971 Sep; 26:(3):266-79. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(71)90069-2.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  17. Mercier P, Lafontant R. Residual alveolar ridge atrophy: classification and influence of facial morphology. J Prosthet Dent. 1979 Jan; 41:(1):90-100. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90363-9.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  18. Seibert JS. Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing. Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville). 1983 Sep-Oct; 4:(5):437-53.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  19. Allen EP, Gainza CS, Farthing GG, Newbold DA. Improved technique for localized ridge augmentation. A report of 21 cases. J Periodontol. 1985 Apr; 56:(4):195-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1985.56.4.195.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  20. Cawood JI, Howell RA. A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988 Aug; 17:(4):232-6. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(88)80047-x.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  21. Eufinger H, Gellrich NC, Sandmann D, Dieckmann J. Descriptive and metric classification of jaw atrophy. An evaluation of 104 mandibles and 96 maxillae of dried skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Feb; 26:(1):23-8. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(97)80841-7.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  22. Meyer U, Vollmer D, Runte C, Bourauel C, Joos U. Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: a finite-element analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2001 Apr; 29:(2):100-5. doi: 10.1054/jcms.2001.0198.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  23. Misch CE, Judy KW. Classification of partially edentulous arches for implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implantol. 1987; 4:(2):7-13.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  24. Al-Nakib LH, Abdullah AO, Abd Al-Kareem SA, Ali SH. An Assessment of Sagittal Condylar Position of TMJ Dysfunction in Centric Occlussion by Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry. 2016; 28:(2):58-62. doi: 10.12816/0028214.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  25. Ahmed AA, Bede SY. Accuracy of ridge mapping procedure in determining the alveolar ridge width. Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry. 2018; 30:(4):24-27. doi: 10.26477/jbcd.v30i4.2551.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  26. Ozdemir F, Tozlu M, Germec Cakan D. Quantitative evaluation of alveolar cortical bone density in adults with different vertical facial types using cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod. 2014 Jan; 44:(1):36-43. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.1.36.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  27. de Oliveira RC, Leles CR, Normanha LM, Lindh C, Ribeiro-Rotta RF. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Feb; 105:(2):231-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.007.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  28. Hindi AR, Bede SY. The effect of osseodensification on implant stability and bone density: A prospective observational study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 May 1; 12:(5):e474-e478. doi: 10.4317/jced.56727.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  29. Noaman AT, Bede SY. The Effect of Bone Density Measured by Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Implant Dimensions on the Stability of Dental Implants. J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Sep 1; 33:(6):e553-e557. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008429.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  30. Branemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. In: Patient selection and preparation. 1st ed. Chicago, Illinois: Quintessence Publishing Company; 1985. p. 199-209.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  31. Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, Griffin TJ, Rand WM. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Mar-Apr; 21:(2):290-7.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  32. Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, Yilmaz B, Ersoy AE. Determination of bone quality of 372 implant recipient sites using Hounsfield unit from computerized tomography: a clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Dec; 10:(4):238-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00085.x.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  33. Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Feb; 12:(1):79-84. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001079.x.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  34. Almasoud NN, Tanneru N, Marei HF. Alveolar bone density and its clinical implication in the placement of dental implants and orthodontic mini-implants. Saudi Med J. 2016 Jun; 37:(6):684-9. doi: 10.15537/Smj.2016.6.14274.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2024.uncidc.1
Loading
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation of ridge shape and bone density in Iraqi sample pre-dental implant insertion
Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care 2024, 1 (٢٠٢٤); https://doi.org/10.5339/jemtac.2024.uncidc.1
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2024.uncidc.1
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2024.uncidc.1
Loading

جارٍ تحميل البيانات والوسائط...

الموضوعات الرئيسية bone density, CBCT, dental implant and ridge shape

الأكثر اقتباسًا لهذا الشهر Most Cited RSS feed

هذه الخانة مطلوبة
يُرجى إدخال عنوان بريد إلكتروني صالح
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error