oa Students learning about research through the process of publishing academic papers in Qatar

References

1. Bender K, Windsor LC. The four Ps of publishing: demystifying publishing in peer-review journals for social work doctoral students. J Teach Soc Work. 2010; 30::147–158
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cortada JW, Stone JH. The history teacher. Soc Hist Educ. 1971; 5::61–65
   [Google Scholar]
3. Katkin W. The Boyer commission and its impact on undergraduate research. New Dir Teach Learn. 2003; 93::19–38
   [Google Scholar]
4. Thiry H, Laursen S, Hunter A-B. What experiences help students become scientists? A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gains for STEM undergraduates. J Higher Educ. 2011; 82:4:357–388
   [Google Scholar]
5. Kuo Y. The Role of a Mentor in Undergraduates' Research Writing Process. Paper presented at the 5^th International Symposium on teaching English at Tertiary Level in Hong Kong Polytechnic University. China: Hong Kong October 2009;
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kwan B. An investigation of instruction in research publishing offer in doctoral programs: the Hong Kong case. Higher Educ. 2010; 59::55–68
   [Google Scholar]
7. Raffa R. An elective course on writing and publishing a review article. Pharm Educ. 2002; 2::51–58
   [Google Scholar]
8. Walkington H, Jenkins A. Embedding undergraduate research publication in the student learning experience. Brookes eJournal Learn Teach. 2012; 2:3, retriev on October 3, 2012 from http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/article/embedding_undergraduate_research_publication_in_the_student_learning_experi/
   [Google Scholar]
9. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for American's Research Universities. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York at Stony Brook 1998;
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fechheimer M, Webber K, Kleiber PB. How well do undergraduate research programs promote engagement and success of students? CBE—Life Sci Educ. 2011; 10::156–163
    [Google Scholar]
11. Badura A, Ware M, Davis SF, Smith R. Teaching beyond the Classroom: Mentoring Student Publications and Presentations. 2000, August;. Paper present at the Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C. From ERIC database (448 363)
    [Google Scholar]
12. Willmott CJR, Clark RP, Harrison TM. Introducing undergraduate students to scientific reports. BEE-J 2003; 1:1, retrieved October 1^st 2012 from BEET vol. 1 Issue 1 http://bio.ltsn.ac.uk/journal/vol1/beej-1-10.htm. Accessed October 1, 2012
    [Google Scholar]
13. Campbell TA, Campbell DE. Faculty/student mentor program: effects on academic performance and retention. Res Higher Educ. 1997; 38::727–742
    [Google Scholar]
14. Stanley CA, Lincoln YS. Cross-race faculty mentoring. Change. 2005; 37::44–50
    [Google Scholar]
15. Endo J, Harpel R. The effect of student faculty interaction on students' educational outcomes. Res Higher Educ. 1982; 16::115–138
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bauer KW, Bennett JS. Alumni perceptions on the value of undergraduate research. J Higher Educ. 2003; 74::210–230
    [Google Scholar]
17. Pacifici LB, Thomson N. Undergraduate science research: a comparison of influences and experiences between Premed and Non-Premed students. Life Sci Educ. 2011; 10::199–208
    [Google Scholar]
18. Seymour E, Hunter A, Laursen SL, Deantoni T. Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences. First findings from a three-year study. Sci Educ. 2004; 88::493–534
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lopatto D. Survey of undergraduate research experience (SURE): first findings. Cell Biol Educ. 2004; 3::270–277
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lopatto D. Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. Cell Biol Educ. 2007; 6::297–306
    [Google Scholar]
21. Campbell A, Skoog GD. Transcending deficits and differences through undergraduate research. In: Taraban RBlanton R, eds. Creating Effective Undergraduate Research Programs in Science: The Transformation from Student to Scientist. New York, NY: Teachers College Press 2008;:206–214
    [Google Scholar]
22. Russell SH. Undergraduate research opportunities: facilitating and encouraging the transition from student to scientist. In: Taraban RBlanton R, eds. Creating Effective Undergraduate Research Programs in Science: The Transformation from Student to Scientist. New York, NY: Teachers College Press 2008;:53–80
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jacobi M. Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: a literature review. Rev Educ Res. 1991; 61::505–532
    [Google Scholar]
24. Anderson G, Dey E, Gray M, Thomas G, Mentors and Protégés: The Influence of Faculty Mentoring on Undergraduate Academic Achievement. From ERIC database (400761) 1995;
    [Google Scholar]
25. Crisp G, Cruz I. Mentoring college students: a critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Res Higher Educ. 2009; 50::525–545
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kram KE. Mentoring processes at work: developmental relationships in managerial careers. Dissertation Abstr Int. 1980; 41:05:1960B. (UMI No. 8025206)
    [Google Scholar]
27. Dolan EL, Johnson D. The undergraduate–postgraduate–faculty triad: unique functions and tensions associated with undergraduate research experiences at research universities. CBE—Life Sci Educ. 2010; 9::543–553
    [Google Scholar]
28. Long J. The dark side of mentoring. Aust Educ Res. 1997; 24::115–123
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ehrich L, Hansford B, Tennent L. Formal mentoring programs in education and other professions: a review of the literature. Educ Adm Q. 2004; 40::518–540
    [Google Scholar]
30. Blanton RL. A brief history of undergraduate research, with consideration of its alternative futures. In: Taraban RBlanton RL, eds. Creating Effective Undergraduate Research Programs in Science: The Transformation from Student to Scientist. New York, NY: Teachers College Press 2008;:233–246
    [Google Scholar]
31. Adedokun OA, Burgess WD. Uncovering students' preconceptions of undergraduate research experiences. J STEM Educ. 2011; 12::12–22
    [Google Scholar]
32. Dunn DS. Collaborative writing in a statistics and research methods course. Teach Psychol. 1996; 23::38–40
    [Google Scholar]
33. Schapman AM. Tips for presenting a poster. J Psychol Inquiry. 1998; 3::53
    [Google Scholar]
34. Johnson TD. New online public health journal created by students for students. Nation's Health. 2008; 38::10
    [Google Scholar]
35. Khersonskaya MY. Impressions and advice about making an undergraduate research presentation. J Psychol Inquiry. 1998; 3::50–51
    [Google Scholar]
36. Garnett P, Holmes R. Research in teaching and learning: a symbiotic relationship. In: Smith BBrown S, eds. Research, Teaching and Learning In Higher Education. London: Kogan Page 1995;:49–57
    [Google Scholar]
37. Diener E, Crandall R. Ethics in Social and Behavioral Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1978;
    [Google Scholar]
38. Nagda A, Gregerman SR, Jonides J, von Hippel W, Lerner JS. Undergraduate student faculty research partnerships, affect student retention. Rev Higher Educ. 1998; 22::55–72
    [Google Scholar]
39. Ferrari J. Mentors in life and at school: impact on undergraduate protege' perceptions of university mission and values. Mentoring Tutoring. 2004; 12::295–305
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wallace JE, Haines VA. The benefits of mentoring for engineering students. J Women Minorities Sci Eng. 2004; 10::377–391
    [Google Scholar]
41. Russell SH, Hancock MP, Mc-Cullough J. The pipeline: benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science. 2007; 316::548–549
    [Google Scholar]
42. Kardash CM. Evaluation of an undergraduate research experience: perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors. J Educ Psychol. 2000; 191::201
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hunter A, Laursen SL, Seymour E. Becoming a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Sci Educ. 2007; 91::36–74
    [Google Scholar]
44. Smith KA, Sheppard SD, Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-bas practices. J Eng Educ. 2005; 94::87–101
    [Google Scholar]
45. Gawel JE, Greengrove CL. Designing undergraduate research experiences for nontraditional student learning at sea. J Geoscience Educ B. 2005; 53::31–36
    [Google Scholar]
46. Putsche L, Storrs D, Lewis A, Haylett J. The development of a mentoring program for university undergraduate women. Cambridge J Educ. 2011; 38::513–528
    [Google Scholar]
47. Kim MM, Rhoades G, Woodard DB. Sponsor research versus graduating students? Intervening variables and unanticipated findings in public research universities. Res Higher Educ. 2003; 44::51–82
    [Google Scholar]
48. Verburgh A, Elen J, Lindblom-Ylanne S. Investigating the myth of the relationship between teaching and research in higher education: a review of empirical research. Stud Philos Educ. 2007; 26::449–465
    [Google Scholar]
49. Seshaiyer P. Transforming practice through undergraduate researchers. Counc Undergraduate Res. 2012; 33:1:8–13
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sengupta S, Leung K. Providing English language support through collegial mentoring: how do we measure its impact? Assess Eval Higher Educ. 2002; 27::365–381
    [Google Scholar]
51. Carpenter S. A study of graduate student authorship in journalism and mass communication journals: 1997–2006. Journalism Mass Commun Educator. 2008; 63::224–240
    [Google Scholar]
52. Whitley GG, Oddi LF, Terrell D. Factors influencing the publishing efforts of graduate students in nursing. J Nurs Educ. 1998; 37::182–185
    [Google Scholar]
53. Brown H, Utting IA. Teaching electronic publishing to computer scientists. Electronic Publishing. 1992; 5::91–96
    [Google Scholar]
54. CIA. CIA World FactBook. Washington, D.C. 2009;. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/qa.html. Accessed December 30, 2011
    [Google Scholar]
55. Giles J. Islam and science: oil rich, science poor. Nature. 2006b; 444::28
    [Google Scholar]
56. Al-Sulayti H. Education and Training in GCC Countries: Some Issues of Concern. Education and the Arab World: Challenges for the Next Millennium. Abu Dhabi, UAE: The Emirates Centre for Strategic Studies and Research 1999;
    [Google Scholar]
57. Government of Qatar Planning Council. Qatar Knowledge Economy Project: Turning Qatar into a Competitive Knowledge-Bas Economy. 2007;. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/KFDLP/Resources/QatarKnowl geEconomyAssessment.pdf. Accessed December 30, 2011
    [Google Scholar]
58. Hasnah O. Research in Undergraduate Education at Qatar University: EE Department Experience. Proceedings of the 37th Frontiers in Education Conference-Global Engineering: Knowledge without borders, opportunities without passports, 2007, October;:S4B-13–S4B-16. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2007.4417939
    [Google Scholar]
59. Nasser R, Viruru R. Tradition, authority and the doing of research: perspectives from the middle East. In: Cannella GSteinberg S, eds. Critical Qualitative Research Reader. New York, NY: Peter Lang 2012;
    [Google Scholar]
60. Giles J. Arab state pours oil profits into science. Nature. 2006a; 441::132–133
    [Google Scholar]
61. Wong NYJ. An Exploratory Research Study of Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP): The Impact of Student-Supervisor Relationships. Paper present at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research (AIR), Boston, MA. From ERIC database (491017), 2004, May;
    [Google Scholar]
62. Halstead. What is undergraduate research? J Chem Educ. 1997; 74::1390–1391
    [Google Scholar]
63. McLeod J. Doing Counseling Research. London: Sage Publications 2003;
    [Google Scholar]
64. Peck DL, Dolch NA. Extraordinary Behavior: A Case to Understanding Social Problems. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press 2000;
    [Google Scholar]
65. Stake R. The Art of Case Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 1995;
    [Google Scholar]
66. Feagin JR, Anthony MO, Gideon S. A Case for the Case Study. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press 1991;
    [Google Scholar]
67. Creswell JW. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson 2005;
    [Google Scholar]
68. Hendricks C. Improving Schools Through Action Research: A Comprehensive Guide for Educators. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson 2009;
    [Google Scholar]
69. Seidman IE. Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press 1998;
    [Google Scholar]
70. Creswell JW. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Quantitative Research. Upper Saddle river, NJ: Merrill/Pearson 2002;
    [Google Scholar]
71. Novak JD. Concept mapping: a useful tool for science education. J Res Sci Teach. 1990; 27::937–949
    [Google Scholar]
72. Novak JD. Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Map as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge 2010;
    [Google Scholar]
73. Songer C, Mintzes J. Understanding cellular respiration: an analysis of conceptual change in college biology. J Res Sci Teach. 1994; 31::621–637
    [Google Scholar]
74. Trwobridge JE, Wandersee JH. Identifying critical junctures in learning in a college course on evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 1994; 31::459–473
    [Google Scholar]
75. Ruiz-Primo MA, Shavelson RJ. Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. J Res Sci Teach. 1996; 33::569–600
    [Google Scholar]
76. McClure J, Sonak B, Suen H. Concept map assessment of classroom learning: reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. J Res Sci Teach. 1999; 36::475–492
    [Google Scholar]
77. Barenholz H, Tamir P. A comprehensive use of concept mapping in design instruction and assessment. Res Sci Technol Educ. 1992; 10::37–52
    [Google Scholar]
78. Elhelou M. The use of concept mapping in learning science subjects by Arab students. Educ Res. 1997; 39::309–317
    [Google Scholar]
79. Von Minden A, Walls R, Nardi A. Charting the links between mathematics content and pedagogy concepts: cartographies of cognition. J Exp Psychol. 1998; 66::339–358
    [Google Scholar]
80. Kerlinger F. Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1986;
    [Google Scholar]
81. Klingner J, Scanlon D, Pressley M. How to publish in scholarly journals. Educ Researcher. 2005; 34::14–20
    [Google Scholar]
82. Graue B. The transformative power of reviewing. Educ Researcher. 2006; 35::36–41
    [Google Scholar]
83. Hyman R. Notes to an incoming journal editor. Am Psychol. 1970; 25::269–273
    [Google Scholar]
84. Suber P. Open Access in 2007. J Electronic Publishing. 2012; 11:1, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/33,36451.0011.110. Accessed January 12, 2012
    [Google Scholar]
85. Willinsky J. The nine flavours of open access scholarly publishing. J Postgrad Med. 2003; 49::263–267
    [Google Scholar]
86. Burbules NC. Web publishing and educational scholarship: where issues of form and content meet. Cambridge J Educ. 1997; 27::273–283
    [Google Scholar]
87. Belcher D. Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. J Second Language Writing. 2006; 16::1–22
    [Google Scholar]
88. Abdulla AD. The development of electronic journals in the Unit Arab Emirates University (UAEU). Collection Building. 2005; 24::48–55
    [Google Scholar]
89. Jiang F, Roberts P. An investigation of the impact of research-l education on student learning and understandings of research. J University Teach Learn Pract. 2011; 8:2, http://ro.uow. u.au/jutlp/vol8/iss2/4. Accessed January 20, 2011
    [Google Scholar]
90. Litman J. Digital Copyright. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books 2006;
    [Google Scholar]
91. Bergstrom TC. Free labor for costly journals. J Econ Perspect. 2001; 15::183–198
    [Google Scholar]
92. Hodge D, Pasquesi K, Hirsh M, LePore P. From Convocation to Capstone: Developing the Student as Scholar. 2007, April;. Keynote Address at Network for Academic Renewal Conference, April 19–21, California. http://www.aacu.org/meetings/undergraduate_research/documents/Keynote.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2012
    [Google Scholar]
93. Flachikov N, Thomson K. Assessment: what drives innovation? J University Teach Learn Pract. 2008; 5::50–60
    [Google Scholar]
94. Healey M. Linking research and teaching: exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-bas learning. In: Barnett R, ed. Reshaping the University: New Relationships between Research, Scholarship and Teaching. London: McGraw Hill/Open University Press 2005;:67–78
    [Google Scholar]
95. Healey M, Jenkins A. Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry. York: The Higher Education Academy 2009;. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/resources/publications/DevelopingUndergraduate_Final.pdf. Accessed January 24, 2012
    [Google Scholar]
96. Robertson J, Blackler G. Students' experiences of learning in a research environment. Higher Educ Res Dev. 2006; 25::215–229
    [Google Scholar]
97. Wards A, Jones SM, Wapstra E, Richardson M. Engaging students through authentic research experiences. UniServe Science Teaching and Learning Research Proceedings. 2007;. http:science.uniserve. u.au/pubs/procs/2007/33.pdf. Accessed January 31, 2011
    [Google Scholar]